diff for duplicates of <1508885697.3164.5.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 50e7745..0c5d0f3 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 15:37 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) { The only reason for getting here is that you're using the old module -load syscall. Is there a reason for not using the new one, which +load syscall. ?Is there a reason for not using the new one, which passes the file descriptor? thanks, @@ -44,3 +44,9 @@ Mimi > return 0; /* We rely on module signature checking */ > } > return 0; + + +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in +the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 3a6d2c7..6a80cf4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,17 +1,9 @@ "ref\0cover.1508865786.git.brdeoliv@redhat.com\0" "ref\0b1bab0d1184f11c06ba0484883c22bc046ffb5a6.1508865786.git.brdeoliv@redhat.com\0" - "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline param instead of CONFIG\0" + "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v3 2/2] ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline param instead of CONFIG\0" "Date\0Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:54:57 -0400\0" - "To\0Bruno E. O. Meneguele <brdeoliv@redhat.com>" - " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" - "Cc\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - serge@hallyn.com - james.l.morris@oracle.com - dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com - rusty@rustcorp.com.au - " jeyu@kernel.org\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 15:37 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:\n" @@ -44,7 +36,7 @@ "> \tif (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) {\n" "\n" "The only reason for getting here is that you're using the old module\n" - "load syscall. Is there a reason for not using the new one, which\n" + "load syscall. ?Is there a reason for not using the new one, which\n" "passes the file descriptor?\n" "\n" "thanks,\n" @@ -59,6 +51,12 @@ "> -#endif\n" "> \t\treturn 0;\t/* We rely on module signature checking */\n" "> \t}\n" - "> \treturn 0;" + "> \treturn 0;\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -a91a57d33d705ce2167bf56953119a2717e01fe85821bae4fbc595a645e4e0e9 +687afa9612e99a7ac533f008458828fca2a2fb3d9030a59e0110e3ed2e1c71d6
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 50e7745..7dd7da6 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 15:37 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) { The only reason for getting here is that you're using the old module -load syscall. Is there a reason for not using the new one, which +load syscall. Is there a reason for not using the new one, which passes the file descriptor? thanks, diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 3a6d2c7..d1062f2 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ "> \tif (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) {\n" "\n" "The only reason for getting here is that you're using the old module\n" - "load syscall. Is there a reason for not using the new one, which\n" + "load syscall. \302\240Is there a reason for not using the new one, which\n" "passes the file descriptor?\n" "\n" "thanks,\n" @@ -61,4 +61,4 @@ "> \t}\n" "> \treturn 0;" -a91a57d33d705ce2167bf56953119a2717e01fe85821bae4fbc595a645e4e0e9 +c5bcac6b63fccbbcf31f26dccb22727daa916519356b7178931cdf7f3b328462
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.