All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1509027463.5886.26.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7c95aa0..1634384 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 15:42 +0800, joeyli wrote:
 > > leaves out testing to see if the integrity subsystem is enabled.
 > > 
 > > Commit 503ceaef8e2e "ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring
-> > file signatures" was upstreamed.  An additional patch could force
+> > file signatures" was upstreamed. ?An additional patch could force
 > > these rules to be added to the custom policy, if lockdown is enabled.
-> >  This and other patches in this series could then check to see if
+> > ?This and other patches in this series could then check to see if
 > > is_ima_appraise_enabled() is true.
 > > 
 > > Mimi
@@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 15:42 +0800, joeyli wrote:
 > I have updated the patch title and description, and I also added
 > is_ima_appraise_enabled() as the following. Is it good to you?
 
-Yes, that works.  Thanks!  Remember is_ima_appraise_enabled() is
+Yes, that works. ?Thanks! ?Remember is_ima_appraise_enabled() is
 dependent on the "ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode"
-patch - http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/201
+patch -?http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/201
 7-October/003910.html.
 
 The IMA "secure_boot" policy can be specified on the boot command line
-as ima_policy="secure_boot".  It requires kernel modules, firmware,
-kexec kernel image and the IMA custom policy to be signed.  In
+as ima_policy="secure_boot". ?It requires kernel modules, firmware,
+kexec kernel image and the IMA custom policy to be signed. ?In
 lockdown mode, these rules are enabled by default and added to the
 custom policy.
 
@@ -49,3 +49,8 @@ security_kernel_post_read_file() hooks, which call ima_read_file() and
 ima_post_read_file() respectively.
 
 Mimi
+
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 3eeb6ae..9c9f4a3 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,18 +2,10 @@
  "ref\0150842468754.7923.10037578333644594134.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk\0"
  "ref\01508774083.3639.124.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\020171026074243.GM8550@linux-l9pv.suse\0"
- "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 07/27] kexec_file: Disable at runtime if securelevel has been set\0"
+ "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 07/27] kexec_file: Disable at runtime if securelevel has been set\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:17:43 -0400\0"
- "To\0joeyli <jlee@suse.com>\0"
- "Cc\0David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>"
-  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
-  gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
-  linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
-  matthew.garrett@nebula.com
-  gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
- " jforbes@redhat.com\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 15:42 +0800, joeyli wrote:\n"
@@ -35,9 +27,9 @@
  "> > leaves out testing to see if the integrity subsystem is enabled.\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > Commit 503ceaef8e2e \"ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring\n"
- "> > file signatures\" was upstreamed. \302\240An additional patch could force\n"
+ "> > file signatures\" was upstreamed. ?An additional patch could force\n"
  "> > these rules to be added to the custom policy, if lockdown is enabled.\n"
- "> > \302\240This and other patches in this series could then check to see if\n"
+ "> > ?This and other patches in this series could then check to see if\n"
  "> > is_ima_appraise_enabled() is true.\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > Mimi\n"
@@ -46,14 +38,14 @@
  "> I have updated the patch title and description, and I also added\n"
  "> is_ima_appraise_enabled() as the following. Is it good to you?\n"
  "\n"
- "Yes, that works. \302\240Thanks! \302\240Remember is_ima_appraise_enabled() is\n"
+ "Yes, that works. ?Thanks! ?Remember is_ima_appraise_enabled() is\n"
  "dependent on the \"ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode\"\n"
- "patch -\302\240http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/201\n"
+ "patch -?http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/201\n"
  "7-October/003910.html.\n"
  "\n"
  "The IMA \"secure_boot\" policy can be specified on the boot command line\n"
- "as ima_policy=\"secure_boot\". \302\240It requires kernel modules, firmware,\n"
- "kexec kernel image and the IMA custom policy to be signed. \302\240In\n"
+ "as ima_policy=\"secure_boot\". ?It requires kernel modules, firmware,\n"
+ "kexec kernel image and the IMA custom policy to be signed. ?In\n"
  "lockdown mode, these rules are enabled by default and added to the\n"
  "custom policy.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -66,6 +58,11 @@
  "security_kernel_post_read_file() hooks, which call ima_read_file() and\n"
  "ima_post_read_file() respectively.\n"
  "\n"
- Mimi
+ "Mimi\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-e5a2456c1210cd576922a3882ce548e20e9481915e555095757ce1361577655b
+1f97c409235e3792c075e22568ca96d3b9c49e3382f5074a0c7d8262a82ec1aa

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.