From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com (mail-wr0-f180.google.com [209.85.128.180]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCAC6E650 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w105so3419045wrc.0 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:38:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dQYOgt8JDPhrZnyQ509kIyqKF52PjADIv9IQ69LCcNA=; b=vwGX0w+6Z9zaAiIwoy/5iefnMZjNc7cFyw7JbA19TlrpdTNE8H9ISj1ffznAupI1nT pgnK1CswM+EVkkzh9MiJFj+UTtc0Y2NTBxJRYxdDwTwReKG0Myy1D3ThyrSu7LXmm9Qo o9DKXkQmXp1u+pA+74bE85GNMcsxGbQDOnxGo0Jk0x6xMU4y/7vdlcNQ6Yc5rqoUUW8v E1rJFBPbFNpFf8Yj33ZGGzqvGyv84hpXQ6ZSE/utfXiSvKQ4GKm61Bqgdke40+fTKVy1 PwucWFL21NpEqEPgq695ywL9drMVWlfOikvPrl/5nJXCsZ242YiVu2+Z1rgr6m7oMU9q oOZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dQYOgt8JDPhrZnyQ509kIyqKF52PjADIv9IQ69LCcNA=; b=Bm7cnElISTyWTgNlS39k9s4R2TrwGowjL0GKOt0Nu87VTkFsB2JKNHUyShDZ/vcOgJ iYKF+UptVnds9Zla6rM8yF2Sa9LygMe0reUgJuRoTyvBXawJWqbu0ytuWSwkne4BhxqP ZyxpxYeE1/zI3Ht8Wmi608fH1DQ7GhBEQ0VBn4KgHfjxShBVS4Uqad26rSQ79DEQOWMT pIfe/OZlvniL6dYih61XAb4ZwCmGfkbVYay/kDsCb50VILOwzwom6r2+13gXseEiJ8HF ETjPdxew96J/Yf40dKEDK4wYgz6HrJk2gGmKxTc3xScfIeumlMJ/lx7nQGu9Voo5cO+6 9YxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWYAFteanZxekEAi830Q/WjkrFG9PTDOcPpB+IWmo/oKks1zS6j jMwjc8/JOcURu3d0vAth0LjaJ9I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+R8rGk8C2PYDuiQVOWOrDNNgGBo/JRdS0IjmcR5tQ1ZY/p+06HjpYP99K/WkOGfCUTx5T5Stg== X-Received: by 10.223.177.143 with SMTP id q15mr6069420wra.269.1509028708628; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p54BD545B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.189.84.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m126sm1040837wmf.31.2017.10.26.07.38.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1509028706.25153.130.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Leonardo Sandoval Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:38:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1509028643.11251.23@fm-out.intel.com> References: <20171019201047.148436-1-leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> <1509010439.25153.128.camel@intel.com> <1509028643.11251.23@fm-out.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu: upgrade to 2.10.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:38:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 09:37 -0500, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > I used devtool upgrade and the only hunk I need to remove was > thisone, the rest were applied cleanly. The rest was applied *silently*, but not *cleanly*. The lesson here is basically that developers shouldn't blindly trust the tools. If something is odd, investigate. What was odd in this case is that it looked like a patch was partially merged. Why would anyone do that? And indeed, it was merged completely. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.