From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751532AbdJ2PTt (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2017 11:19:49 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0052.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.52]:33375 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751152AbdJ2PTr (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2017 11:19:47 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1381:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:1801:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3872:4321:4605:5007:6119:7514:7576:7903:9149:9545:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11233:11473:11658:11914:12043:12438:12555:12740:12760:12895:12986:13069:13071:13311:13357:13439:14180:14181:14659:14721:21060:21080:21451:21627:30012:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:31,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: ants73_37ddfd6767854 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2608 Message-ID: <1509290382.26592.7.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix line too long warning From: Joe Perches To: Kien Ha , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:19:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1509245173.3669.5.camel@gmail.com> References: <1509245173.3669.5.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 22:46 -0400, Kien Ha wrote: > From fc52a98aca0c033f2c03fdc7e8f83ae49625675a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kien Ha > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:07:55 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix line too long warning > > Signed-off-by: Kien Ha Hi. Instead of merely shutting up checkpatch warnings, always try to improve the code instead. Look at the flow of this cascaded if / else { if and transform it to a simpler if ... else if ... else if ... if (sta && sta->vht_cap.vht_supported) { tcb_desc->hw_rate = _rtl_get_vht_highest_n_rate(hw, sta); } else { if (sta && (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported)) { tcb_desc->hw_rate = _rtl_get_highest_n_rate(hw, sta); } else { if (rtlmac->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_B) { tcb_desc->hw_rate = rtlpriv->cfg->maps[RTL_RC_CCK_RATE11M]; } else { tcb_desc->hw_rate = rtlpriv->cfg->maps[RTL_RC_OFDM_RATE54M]; } } } This block could be tcb_desc->hw_rate = sta && sta->vht_cap.vht_supported ? _rtl_get_vht_highest_n_rate(hw, sta) : sta && sta->ht_cap.ht_supported ? _rtl_get_highest_n_rate(hw, sta) : rtlmac->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_B ? rtlpriv->cfg->maps[RTL_RC_CCK_RATE11M] : rtlpriv->cfg->maps[RTL_RC_OFDM_RATE54M]; which seems easier to read.