All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/kvm: fix detection of guest machine checks" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:29:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <150935577916194@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    s390/kvm: fix detection of guest machine checks

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     s390-kvm-fix-detection-of-guest-machine-checks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 0a5e2ec2647737907d267c09dc9a25fab1468865 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:29:47 +0200
Subject: s390/kvm: fix detection of guest machine checks

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

commit 0a5e2ec2647737907d267c09dc9a25fab1468865 upstream.

The new detection code for guest machine checks added a check based
on %r11 to .Lcleanup_sie to distinguish between normal asynchronous
interrupts and machine checks. But the funtion is called from the
program check handler as well with an undefined value in %r11.

The effect is that all program exceptions pointing to the SIE instruction
will set the CIF_MCCK_GUEST bit. The bit stays set for the CPU until the
 next machine check comes in which will incorrectly be interpreted as a
guest machine check.

The simplest fix is to stop using .Lcleanup_sie in the program check
handler and duplicate a few instructions.

Fixes: c929500d7a5a ("s390/nmi: s390: New low level handling for machine check happening in guest")
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.S |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -521,12 +521,15 @@ ENTRY(pgm_check_handler)
 	tmhh	%r8,0x0001		# test problem state bit
 	jnz	2f			# -> fault in user space
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
-	# cleanup critical section for sie64a
+	# cleanup critical section for program checks in sie64a
 	lgr	%r14,%r9
 	slg	%r14,BASED(.Lsie_critical_start)
 	clg	%r14,BASED(.Lsie_critical_length)
 	jhe	0f
-	brasl	%r14,.Lcleanup_sie
+	lg	%r14,__SF_EMPTY(%r15)		# get control block pointer
+	ni	__SIE_PROG0C+3(%r14),0xfe	# no longer in SIE
+	lctlg	%c1,%c1,__LC_USER_ASCE		# load primary asce
+	larl	%r9,sie_exit			# skip forward to sie_exit
 #endif
 0:	tmhh	%r8,0x4000		# PER bit set in old PSW ?
 	jnz	1f			# -> enabled, can't be a double fault


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from schwidefsky@de.ibm.com are

queue-4.13/s390-kvm-fix-detection-of-guest-machine-checks.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=150935577916194@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.