From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYE9v-00046x-Ee for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:55:59 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2012 02:42:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,765,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="248308582" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.166]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2012 02:42:03 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Phil Blundell Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:42:02 +0000 Message-ID: <1509472.8pSTkUQEym@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1352758235.6869.152.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> References: <12301427.Yf0uchSh3U@helios> <1352758235.6869.152.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: OE-Classic recipe migration status X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:55:59 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 12 November 2012 22:10:35 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 19:11 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > 136 PERL > > I encountered the horror that is the perl modules a few weeks ago while > I was working on mythtv. At the time it seemed as though there were > more like 13600 recipes but I imagine your figure is probably the > accurate one. It looks as though I managed to fix up 37 recipes to work > with oe-core before the tedium got too much. I'm only counting recipes with "perl" in the name, there could be others but I suspect that has caught most of them. > I think this stuff probably wants to go into a dedicated > meta-perl-modules layer since in most cases there is no obvious > functional grouping. Sounds good. > I could publish those 37 as a starting point and > anybody else who wants to add more is welcome to do so. Great, thanks! Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre