All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.4: mmap() fails for certain legal requests
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 14:54:48 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15096.27432.381478.837650@pizda.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010508232117.4713F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>


Czesc,

Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
 >  Yep, I know (ia64 and sparc*).  But being lazy enough (and being short on
 > time) I won't do it until I know the idea of the change is accepted.  I'm
 > sorry -- I sent previous versions of the patch twice since last Summer
 > with no response at all and doing bits no one is interested in is a waste
 > of time.
 > 
 >  Thanks for your response, though -- maybe there is someone interested,
 > after all. 

That's pretty arrogant that cut and pasting a few lines into some
architecture specific files and reporting the updated patch is too
much to ask.

Perhaps reviewing your change is also, too much to ask.  Perhaps
we are too lazy and short on time to have a look at your change.

I don't think it's asking a lot to provide a complete change.

I'm sure the MIPS folks know all too well whats it's like when their
port is crapped up because someone only made changes to x86 port
portions.  At least for me on after working on Sparc for some time,
I'm adamant about providing complete changes so that this kind of
grief is avoided for other port maintainers.

In the time you used to compose your response to me, and now
to read this email from me, you could have fixed up the patch
perhaps 2 or 3 times.  Just do it and get it over with ok?

Dziekuje.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-08 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-08 20:21 [patch] 2.4.4: mmap() fails for certain legal requests Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-08 20:47 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-08 21:32   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-08 21:54     ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-05-08 22:59       ` Alan Cox
2001-05-08 22:59         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-08 23:59         ` David S. Miller
2001-05-08 23:59           ` David S. Miller
2001-05-08 23:46       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 12:03         ` Michael Shmulevich
2001-05-09 12:41           ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15096.27432.381478.837650@pizda.ninka.net \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.