From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64: ensure __dump_instr() checks addr_limit" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:45:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150989311966133@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: ensure __dump_instr() checks addr_limit
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-ensure-__dump_instr-checks-addr_limit.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 7a7003b1da010d2b0d1dc8bf21c10f5c73b389f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:12:03 +0000
Subject: arm64: ensure __dump_instr() checks addr_limit
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
commit 7a7003b1da010d2b0d1dc8bf21c10f5c73b389f1 upstream.
It's possible for a user to deliberately trigger __dump_instr with a
chosen kernel address.
Let's avoid problems resulting from this by using get_user() rather than
__get_user(), ensuring that we don't erroneously access kernel memory.
Where we use __dump_instr() on kernel text, we already switch to
KERNEL_DS, so this shouldn't adversely affect those cases.
Fixes: 60ffc30d5652810d ("arm64: Exception handling")
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void __dump_instr(const char *lvl
for (i = -4; i < 1; i++) {
unsigned int val, bad;
- bad = __get_user(val, &((u32 *)addr)[i]);
+ bad = get_user(val, &((u32 *)addr)[i]);
if (!bad)
p += sprintf(p, i == 0 ? "(%08x) " : "%08x ", val);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mark.rutland@arm.com are
queue-4.9/arm64-ensure-__dump_instr-checks-addr_limit.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-11-05 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150989311966133@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.