All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1509958288489.45871@axon.tv>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 4e1b93a..375f0af 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Hi, according to Xilinx, from a computer host it happens in a second, while for us in the Zynq (ARM) takes way more than that as explained before. And indeed the programming is done via config accesses, and can't happen otherwise as this is the way Xilinx created its FPGA IP (Intellectual Property) cores. Still if I do a baremetal test (so no Linux) and write from the ARMs to the FPGA via those registers, it takes only 17 cycles instead of the Linux implementation which takes 250 cycles. 
 
 Ruben Guerra Marin
-ruben.guerra.marin@axon.tv
+ruben.guerra.marin at axon.tv
 
 ________________________________________
 From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
 Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 2:54 PM
 To: Michal Simek
-Cc: Ruben Guerra Marin; bhelgaas@google.com; soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com; bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+Cc: Ruben Guerra Marin; bhelgaas at google.com; soren.brinkmann at xilinx.com; bharat.kumar.gogada at xilinx.com; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
 Subject: Re: Performance issues writing to PCIe in a Zynq
 
 On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9ced271..af6f580 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,28 +1,22 @@
  "ref\01509636637116.27702@axon.tv\0"
  "ref\0eca01e58-3da1-d5c4-00f7-71dd6a926870@xilinx.com\0"
  "ref\020171103135457.GA8457@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com\0"
- "From\0Ruben Guerra Marin <ruben.guerra.marin@axon.tv>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: Performance issues writing to PCIe in a Zynq\0"
+ "From\0ruben.guerra.marin@axon.tv (Ruben Guerra Marin)\0"
+ "Subject\0Performance issues writing to PCIe in a Zynq\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:51:28 +0000\0"
- "To\0Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>"
- " Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>\0"
- "Cc\0bhelgaas@google.com <bhelgaas@google.com>"
-  soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
-  bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
-  linux-pci@vger.kernel.org <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi, according to Xilinx, from a computer host it happens in a second, while for us in the Zynq (ARM) takes way more than that as explained before. And indeed the programming is done via config accesses, and can't happen otherwise as this is the way Xilinx created its FPGA IP (Intellectual Property) cores. Still if I do a baremetal test (so no Linux) and write from the ARMs to the FPGA via those registers, it takes only 17 cycles instead of the Linux implementation which takes 250 cycles. \n"
  "\n"
  "Ruben Guerra Marin\n"
- "ruben.guerra.marin@axon.tv\n"
+ "ruben.guerra.marin at axon.tv\n"
  "\n"
  "________________________________________\n"
  "From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>\n"
  "Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 2:54 PM\n"
  "To: Michal Simek\n"
- "Cc: Ruben Guerra Marin; bhelgaas@google.com; soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com; bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ "Cc: Ruben Guerra Marin; bhelgaas at google.com; soren.brinkmann at xilinx.com; bharat.kumar.gogada at xilinx.com; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org\n"
  "Subject: Re: Performance issues writing to PCIe in a Zynq\n"
  "\n"
  "On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:\n"
@@ -77,4 +71,4 @@
  "\n"
  Bjorn
 
-1eb25115ed508b38464ed1997a61c223dc5bc30e014bac796f059590994f878c
+c9ded81e6ccd068a90563192608d24a22fc1094ab93754b5795b4f55211e4c80

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.