All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 07/12] intel_sgx: driver for Intel Software Guard Extensions
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 06:56:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509980216.8259.2.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106113337.ib44j6prbajqcybt@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 13:33 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:08:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:10:29PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:32 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > +static int sgx_dev_init(struct device *parent, bool locked_msrs)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct sgx_context *sgx_dev;
> > > > +	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > > > +	unsigned long pa;
> > > > +	unsigned long size;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +	int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +	pr_info("intel_sgx: " DRV_DESCRIPTION " v" DRV_VERSION "\n");
> > > > +
> > > > +	sgx_dev = sgxm_ctx_alloc(parent);
> > > > +
> > > > +	sgx_locked_msrs = locked_msrs;
> > > > +
> > > > +	cpuid_count(SGX_CPUID, SGX_CPUID_CAPABILITIES, &eax, &ebx,
> > > > &ecx,
> > > > &edx);
> > > > +	/* Only allow misc bits supported by the driver. */
> > > > +	sgx_misc_reserved = ~ebx | SGX_MISC_RESERVED_MASK;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > > +	sgx_encl_size_max_64 = 1ULL << ((edx >> 8) & 0xFF);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +	sgx_encl_size_max_32 = 1ULL << (edx & 0xFF);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE)) {
> > > > +		cpuid_count(SGX_CPUID, SGX_CPUID_ATTRIBUTES, &eax,
> > > > &ebx,
> > > > &ecx,
> > > > +			    &edx);
> > > > +		sgx_xfrm_mask = (((u64)edx) << 32) + (u64)ecx;
> > > > +
> > > > +		for (i = 2; i < 64; i++) {
> > > > +			cpuid_count(0x0D, i, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > > > +			if ((1 << i) & sgx_xfrm_mask)
> > > > +				sgx_xsave_size_tbl[i] = eax + ebx;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < SGX_MAX_EPC_BANKS; i++) {
> > > > +		cpuid_count(SGX_CPUID, i + SGX_CPUID_EPC_BANKS, &eax,
> > > > &ebx,
> > > > +			    &ecx, &edx);
> > > > +		if (!(eax & 0xf))
> > > > +			break;
> > > > +
> > > > +		pa = ((u64)(ebx & 0xfffff) << 32) + (u64)(eax &
> > > > 0xfffff000);
> > > > +		size = ((u64)(edx & 0xfffff) << 32) + (u64)(ecx &
> > > > 0xfffff000);
> > > > +
> > > > +		dev_info(parent, "EPC bank 0x%lx-0x%lx\n", pa, pa +
> > > > size);
> > > > +
> > > > +		sgx_epc_banks[i].pa = pa;
> > > > +		sgx_epc_banks[i].size = size;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	sgx_nr_epc_banks = i;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < sgx_nr_epc_banks; i++) {
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > > +		sgx_epc_banks[i].va = (unsigned long)
> > > > +			ioremap_cache(sgx_epc_banks[i].pa,
> > > > +				      sgx_epc_banks[i].size);
> > > > +		if (!sgx_epc_banks[i].va) {
> > > > +			sgx_nr_epc_banks = i;
> > > > +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > +			goto out_iounmap;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +		ret = sgx_add_epc_bank(sgx_epc_banks[i].pa,
> > > > +				       sgx_epc_banks[i].size, i);
> > > > +		if (ret) {
> > > > +			sgx_nr_epc_banks = i + 1;
> > > > +			goto out_iounmap;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = sgx_page_cache_init();
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_iounmap;
> > > > +
> > > > +	sgx_add_page_wq = alloc_workqueue("intel_sgx-add-page-wq",
> > > > +					  WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_FREEZABLE,
> > > > 1);
> > > > +	if (!sgx_add_page_wq) {
> > > > +		pr_err("intel_sgx: alloc_workqueue() failed\n");
> > > > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > +		goto out_iounmap;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = cdev_device_add(&sgx_dev->cdev, &sgx_dev->dev);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_workqueue;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +out_workqueue:
> > > > +	destroy_workqueue(sgx_add_page_wq);
> > > > +out_iounmap:
> > > sgx_page_cache_teardown() should be called here, else ksgxswapd and the
> > > list of
> > > EPC pages will leak.
> > > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < sgx_nr_epc_banks; i++)
> > > > +		iounmap((void *)sgx_epc_banks[i].va);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +	return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > ... 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > +int sgx_add_epc_bank(resource_size_t start, unsigned long size, int
> > > > bank)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned long i;
> > > > +	struct sgx_epc_page *new_epc_page, *entry;
> > > > +	struct list_head *parser, *temp;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < size; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > > > +		new_epc_page = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_epc_page),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +		if (!new_epc_page)
> > > > +			goto err_freelist;
> > > > +		new_epc_page->pa = (start + i) | bank;
> > > > +
> > > > +		spin_lock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > > +		list_add_tail(&new_epc_page->list, &sgx_free_list);
> > > > +		sgx_nr_total_epc_pages++;
> > > > +		sgx_nr_free_pages++;
> > > > +		spin_unlock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +err_freelist:
> > > > +	list_for_each_safe(parser, temp, &sgx_free_list) {
> > > > +		spin_lock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > > +		entry = list_entry(parser, struct sgx_epc_page, list);
> > > > +		list_del(&entry->list);
> > > > +		spin_unlock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > > +		kfree(entry);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +	return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +}
> > > Freeing the entire list on failure does not seem like the appropriate
> > > behavior
> > > for this helper func, e.g. the list should be purged by
> > > sgx_page_cache_teardown.
> > > Buffering the new pages into a local list and only splicing said list into
> > > the
> > > global list upon success is more inline with what I would expect from a
> > > helper
> > > func, and also only requires a single lock/unlock.
> > > 
> > > diff --git drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx/sgx_page_cache.c
> > > drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx/sgx_page_cache.c
> > > index f8883d24692a..38496e6296f1 100644
> > > --- drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx/sgx_page_cache.c
> > > +++ drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx/sgx_page_cache.c
> > > @@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ int sgx_add_epc_bank(resource_size_t start, unsigned
> > > long
> > > size, int bank)
> > >  {
> > >         unsigned long i;
> > >         struct sgx_epc_page *new_epc_page, *entry;
> > > -       struct list_head *parser, *temp;
> > > +       LIST_HEAD(epc_pages);
> > >  
> > >         for (i = 0; i < size; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > >                 new_epc_page = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_epc_page), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > @@ -405,22 +406,19 @@ int sgx_add_epc_bank(resource_size_t start, unsigned
> > > long
> > > size, int bank)
> > >                         goto err_freelist;
> > >                 new_epc_page->pa = (start + i) | bank;
> > >  
> > > -               spin_lock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > -               list_add_tail(&new_epc_page->list, &sgx_free_list);
> > > -               sgx_nr_total_epc_pages++;
> > > -               sgx_nr_free_pages++;
> > > -               spin_unlock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > +               list_add_tail(&new_epc_page->list, &epc_pages);
> > > +               nr_pages++;
> > >         }
> > >  
> > > +       spin_lock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > +       list_splice_tail(&epc_pages, &sgx_free_list);
> > > +       sgx_nr_total_epc_pages += nr_pages;
> > > +       sgx_nr_free_pages += nr_pages;
> > > +       spin_unlock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > >         return 0;
> > >  err_freelist:
> > > -       list_for_each_safe(parser, temp, &sgx_free_list) {
> > > -               spin_lock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > -               entry = list_entry(parser, struct sgx_epc_page, list);
> > > -               list_del(&entry->list);
> > > -               spin_unlock(&sgx_free_list_lock);
> > > +       list_for_each_entry(entry, &sgx_free_list, list)
> > >                 kfree(entry);
> > > -       }
> > >         return -ENOMEM;
> > >  }
> > This makes sense to me and I think it makes also sense to move bunch of
> > stuff from sgx_dev_init() to sgx_page_cache_init().
> > /Jarkko
> You can get away without nr_pages as you can get from i or am I
> misobserving something?

i is incremented by PAGE_SIZE.  I suppose you could do "+= i / PAGE_SIZE", but I
would opt for clarity in this case.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10 14:32 [PATCH RFC v3 00/12] Intel(R) SGX Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/12] intel_sgx: updated MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/12] x86: add SGX definition to cpufeature Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/12] x86: define the feature control MSR's SGX enable bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/12] x86: define the feature control MSR's SGX launch control bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/12] x86: add SGX MSRs to msr-index.h Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/12] fs/pipe.c: export create_pipe_files() and replace_fd() Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/12] intel_sgx: ptrace() support Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/12] intel_sgx: driver documentation Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/12] intel_sgx: in-kernel launch enclave Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-08 20:07   ` [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] " Sean Christopherson
2017-11-14 14:22     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/12] intel_sgx: glue code for in-kernel LE Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-10 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/12] intel_sgx: update IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASH* MSRs Jarkko Sakkinen
     [not found] ` <20171010143258.21623-8-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2017-10-10 15:41   ` [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 07/12] intel_sgx: driver for Intel Software Guard Extensions Sean Christopherson
2017-10-11 11:46     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-11 15:56       ` Sean Christopherson
2017-10-10 18:26   ` Sean Christopherson
2017-10-13 19:58     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-13 20:02       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-13 20:08         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-13 20:13           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-12 16:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2017-10-13 19:16     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-02 19:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2017-11-06  7:23     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-02 20:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2017-11-06 11:08     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-06 11:33       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-06 14:56         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2017-11-08  6:25           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-06 11:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-06 14:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2017-11-07 18:43         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-06 15:54   ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-07 18:47     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-07 19:05       ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-14 19:33         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-14 21:05           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-14 21:12             ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1509980216.8259.2.camel@intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.