All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Draszik" <git@andred.net>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:02:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510668148.4049.71.camel@andred.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LbnJtZG2LTe_NsOgH5-q1y7JectDHDM0h9nJMbi5txb9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 11:41 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 14 November 2017 at 11:34, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > But don't we remove the old version from the feeds, or does that only
> > happen if the arch matches?
> > 
> 
> Well the feed pruning is working correctly:

Not for me. I created a dummy package foo_0.1.bb, with PACKAGE_ARCH =
"${MACHINE_ARCH}"

after bitbake foo:
$ build.pyro > find tmp/deploy/ipk/ -name foo*ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dbg_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dev_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk

Removing the PACKAGE_ARCH line from that recipe and rebuilding foo gives me:

$ build.pyro > find tmp/deploy/ipk/ -name foo*ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo-dbg_0.1-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-
nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo-dev_0.1-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-
nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo_0.1-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dbg_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dev_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk


If I bump the version, I am still left with the MACHINE_ARCH packages
(doesn't matter if I bump the version before or after the change to
PACKAGE_ARCH):
$ build.pyro > find tmp/deploy/ipk/ -name foo*ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo-dbg_0.2-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-
nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo-dev_0.2-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-
nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/mips32r2el-24kec-nf/f/foo/foo_0.2-r0_mips32r2el-24kec-nf.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dbg_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo-dev_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk
tmp/deploy/ipk/tgm_r3/f/foo/foo_0.1-r0_tgm_r3.ipk

So of course do_rootfs will pick the outdated version.

Is that an ipk / OPKG issue? Should something be removing the old packages
from deploy?


Cheers,
Andre'



  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-13  5:26 [PATCH 0/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting Chen Qi
2017-11-13  5:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2017-11-13  8:54   ` André Draszik
2017-11-13 10:12     ` Martin Jansa
2017-11-13 10:34       ` opkg --prefer-arch-to-version (was: Re: [PATCH 1/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting) André Draszik
2017-11-13 12:05         ` Martin Jansa
2017-11-13 11:54     ` [PATCH 1/1] autoconf-archive: inherit allarch and fix package splitting Robert Yang
2017-11-14 10:16       ` André Draszik
2017-11-14 11:34         ` Burton, Ross
2017-11-14 11:41           ` Burton, Ross
2017-11-14 14:02             ` André Draszik [this message]
2017-11-15  2:23               ` Robert Yang
2017-11-15  9:06                 ` André Draszik
2017-11-15  9:24                   ` Robert Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510668148.4049.71.camel@andred.net \
    --to=git@andred.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.