From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kai Huang Subject: Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver documentation Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:12:43 +1300 Message-ID: <1510693963.2850.0.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20171113194528.28557-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <1510628465.8102.11.camel@linux.intel.com> <20171114194703.eqeaxeqtpvzmkeec@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:54639 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756774AbdKNVMq (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:12:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171114194703.eqeaxeqtpvzmkeec@linux.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 21:47 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:01:05PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote: > > Not sure whether you should talk about MEE staff here. They are not > > in > > SDM and (thus) may potentially be changed in the future. > > The use of MEE is documented in many places like > > https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/204.pdf > > I see no reason not to talk about MEE. Sure. Thanks for pointing out the paper. > > > IMHO you can just remove this "virtualization" section entirely as > > your > > first upstreaming driver won't consider virtualization at all. > > > > Thanks, > > -Kai > > Makes sense. Thanks. Thanks, -Kai > > /Jarkko