Patch "net/mlx5e: Properly deal with encap flows add/del under neigh update" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    net/mlx5e: Properly deal with encap flows add/del under neigh update

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     net-mlx5e-properly-deal-with-encap-flows-add-del-under-neigh-update.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed Nov 15 17:25:34 CET 2017
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:33:43 +0200
Subject: net/mlx5e: Properly deal with encap flows add/del under neigh update

From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>


[ Upstream commit 3c37745ec614ff048d5dce38f976804b05d307ee ]

Currently, the encap action offload is handled in the actions parse
function and not in mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow() where we deal with all
the other aspects of offloading actions (vlan, modify header) and
the rule itself.

When the neigh update code (mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_add()) recreates the
encap entry and offloads the related flows, we wrongly call again into
mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(), this for itself would cause us to handle
again the offloading of vlans and header re-write which puts things
in non consistent state and step on freed memory (e.g the modify
header parse buffer which is already freed).

Since on error, mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow() detaches and may release the
encap entry, it causes a corruption at the neigh update code which goes
over the list of flows associated with this encap entry, or double free
when the tc flow is later deleted by user-space.

When neigh update (mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_del()) unoffloads the flows related
to an encap entry which is now invalid, we do a partial repeat of the eswitch
flow removal code which is wrong too.

To fix things up we do the following:

(1) handle the encap action offload in the eswitch flow add function
    mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow() as done for the other actions and the rule itself.

(2) modify the neigh update code (mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_add/del) to only
    deal with the encap entry and rules delete/add and not with any of
    the other offloaded actions.

Fixes: 232c001398ae ('net/mlx5e: Add support to neighbour update flow')
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c |   89 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -78,9 +78,11 @@ struct mlx5e_tc_flow {
 };
 
 struct mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr {
+	struct ip_tunnel_info tun_info;
 	struct mlx5_flow_spec spec;
 	int num_mod_hdr_actions;
 	void *mod_hdr_actions;
+	int mirred_ifindex;
 };
 
 enum {
@@ -322,6 +324,12 @@ static void mlx5e_tc_del_nic_flow(struct
 static void mlx5e_detach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 			       struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow);
 
+static int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
+			      struct ip_tunnel_info *tun_info,
+			      struct net_device *mirred_dev,
+			      struct net_device **encap_dev,
+			      struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow);
+
 static struct mlx5_flow_handle *
 mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 		      struct mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr *parse_attr,
@@ -329,9 +337,27 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv
 {
 	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *attr = flow->esw_attr;
-	struct mlx5_flow_handle *rule;
+	struct net_device *out_dev, *encap_dev = NULL;
+	struct mlx5_flow_handle *rule = NULL;
+	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv;
+	struct mlx5e_priv *out_priv;
 	int err;
 
+	if (attr->action & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ENCAP) {
+		out_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(priv->netdev),
+					     attr->parse_attr->mirred_ifindex);
+		err = mlx5e_attach_encap(priv, &parse_attr->tun_info,
+					 out_dev, &encap_dev, flow);
+		if (err) {
+			rule = ERR_PTR(err);
+			if (err != -EAGAIN)
+				goto err_attach_encap;
+		}
+		out_priv = netdev_priv(encap_dev);
+		rpriv = out_priv->ppriv;
+		attr->out_rep = rpriv->rep;
+	}
+
 	err = mlx5_eswitch_add_vlan_action(esw, attr);
 	if (err) {
 		rule = ERR_PTR(err);
@@ -347,10 +373,14 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv
 		}
 	}
 
-	rule = mlx5_eswitch_add_offloaded_rule(esw, &parse_attr->spec, attr);
-	if (IS_ERR(rule))
-		goto err_add_rule;
-
+	/* we get here if (1) there's no error (rule being null) or when
+	 * (2) there's an encap action and we're on -EAGAIN (no valid neigh)
+	 */
+	if (rule != ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN)) {
+		rule = mlx5_eswitch_add_offloaded_rule(esw, &parse_attr->spec, attr);
+		if (IS_ERR(rule))
+			goto err_add_rule;
+	}
 	return rule;
 
 err_add_rule:
@@ -361,6 +391,7 @@ err_mod_hdr:
 err_add_vlan:
 	if (attr->action & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ENCAP)
 		mlx5e_detach_encap(priv, flow);
+err_attach_encap:
 	return rule;
 }
 
@@ -389,6 +420,8 @@ static void mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow(struct
 void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_add(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 			      struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e)
 {
+	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
+	struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr;
 	struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow;
 	int err;
 
@@ -404,10 +437,9 @@ void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_add(struct mlx
 	mlx5e_rep_queue_neigh_stats_work(priv);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(flow, &e->flows, encap) {
-		flow->esw_attr->encap_id = e->encap_id;
-		flow->rule = mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(priv,
-						   flow->esw_attr->parse_attr,
-						   flow);
+		esw_attr = flow->esw_attr;
+		esw_attr->encap_id = e->encap_id;
+		flow->rule = mlx5_eswitch_add_offloaded_rule(esw, &esw_attr->parse_attr->spec, esw_attr);
 		if (IS_ERR(flow->rule)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(flow->rule);
 			mlx5_core_warn(priv->mdev, "Failed to update cached encapsulation flow, %d\n",
@@ -421,15 +453,13 @@ void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_add(struct mlx
 void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_del(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 			      struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e)
 {
+	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow;
-	struct mlx5_fc *counter;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(flow, &e->flows, encap) {
 		if (flow->flags & MLX5E_TC_FLOW_OFFLOADED) {
 			flow->flags &= ~MLX5E_TC_FLOW_OFFLOADED;
-			counter = mlx5_flow_rule_counter(flow->rule);
-			mlx5_del_flow_rules(flow->rule);
-			mlx5_fc_destroy(priv->mdev, counter);
+			mlx5_eswitch_del_offloaded_rule(esw, flow->rule, flow->esw_attr);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1871,7 +1901,7 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct m
 
 		if (is_tcf_mirred_egress_redirect(a)) {
 			int ifindex = tcf_mirred_ifindex(a);
-			struct net_device *out_dev, *encap_dev = NULL;
+			struct net_device *out_dev;
 			struct mlx5e_priv *out_priv;
 
 			out_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(priv->netdev), ifindex);
@@ -1884,17 +1914,13 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct m
 				rpriv = out_priv->ppriv;
 				attr->out_rep = rpriv->rep;
 			} else if (encap) {
-				err = mlx5e_attach_encap(priv, info,
-							 out_dev, &encap_dev, flow);
-				if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
-					return err;
+				parse_attr->mirred_ifindex = ifindex;
+				parse_attr->tun_info = *info;
+				attr->parse_attr = parse_attr;
 				attr->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_ENCAP |
 					MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST |
 					MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_COUNT;
-				out_priv = netdev_priv(encap_dev);
-				rpriv = out_priv->ppriv;
-				attr->out_rep = rpriv->rep;
-				attr->parse_attr = parse_attr;
+				/* attr->out_rep is resolved when we handle encap */
 			} else {
 				pr_err("devices %s %s not on same switch HW, can't offload forwarding\n",
 				       priv->netdev->name, out_dev->name);
@@ -1972,7 +1998,7 @@ int mlx5e_configure_flower(struct mlx5e_
 	if (flow->flags & MLX5E_TC_FLOW_ESWITCH) {
 		err = parse_tc_fdb_actions(priv, f->exts, parse_attr, flow);
 		if (err < 0)
-			goto err_handle_encap_flow;
+			goto err_free;
 		flow->rule = mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(priv, parse_attr, flow);
 	} else {
 		err = parse_tc_nic_actions(priv, f->exts, parse_attr, flow);
@@ -1983,10 +2009,13 @@ int mlx5e_configure_flower(struct mlx5e_
 
 	if (IS_ERR(flow->rule)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(flow->rule);
-		goto err_free;
+		if (err != -EAGAIN)
+			goto err_free;
 	}
 
-	flow->flags |= MLX5E_TC_FLOW_OFFLOADED;
+	if (err != -EAGAIN)
+		flow->flags |= MLX5E_TC_FLOW_OFFLOADED;
+
 	err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&tc->ht, &flow->node,
 				     tc->ht_params);
 	if (err)
@@ -2000,16 +2029,6 @@ int mlx5e_configure_flower(struct mlx5e_
 err_del_rule:
 	mlx5e_tc_del_flow(priv, flow);
 
-err_handle_encap_flow:
-	if (err == -EAGAIN) {
-		err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&tc->ht, &flow->node,
-					     tc->ht_params);
-		if (err)
-			mlx5e_tc_del_flow(priv, flow);
-		else
-			return 0;
-	}
-
 err_free:
 	kvfree(parse_attr);
 	kfree(flow);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ogerlitz@mellanox.com are

queue-4.13/net-mlx5e-properly-deal-with-encap-flows-add-del-under-neigh-update.patch