All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1510790701.3711.359.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 4996e3f..19aacfd 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:46 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
 > > > > > 
 > > > > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=90a53e4432b12288316efaa5f308adafb8d304b0
 > > > > 
-> > > > Johannes was tired of waiting?  Commit 5a9196d "ima: add support for
+> > > > Johannes was tired of waiting? ?Commit 5a9196d "ima: add support for
 > > > > measuring and appraising firmware" has been in the kernel since linux-
 > > > > 3.17.
 > > > > 
 > > > > The original firmware hook for verifying firmware signatures were
 > > > > replaced with the common LSM pre and post kernel_read_file() hooks
-> > > > in linux-4.6.y.
+> > > > in?linux-4.6.y.
 > > > > 
 > > > > Even if you wanted to support firmware signature verification without
 > > > > IMA-appraisal, it should be using the LSM hooks.
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:46 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
 > > kernel_read_file_from_path(), not as a stand alone verification.
 > > 
 > > Why not extend kernel_read_file_from_path() to pass the detached signature?
-> > Since the signature would only be used for the verification, there's no need
+> >?Since the signature would only be used for the verification, there's no need
 > > to return the open file descriptor.
 > 
 > This goes along with the question if there were an other users who wanted it,
@@ -48,16 +48,21 @@ On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:46 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
 > systems pegged with "trusted boot" have nothing to do validation of these files
 > through hardware.
 
-No, it has nothing to do with other users wanting it.  It has to do
+No, it has nothing to do with other users wanting it. ?It has to do
 with extending an API to support detach signatures.
 
 There's no reason to define a new function named
-kernel_read_file_from_path_signed().  To prevent code duplication, the
-existing functions would turn into wrappers.  It's not like there are
-that many users.  A quick search returned:
+kernel_read_file_from_path_signed(). ?To prevent code duplication, the
+existing functions would turn into wrappers. ?It's not like there are
+that many users. ?A quick search returned:
 
-kernel_read_file_from_fd:  2
+kernel_read_file_from_fd: ?2
 kernel_read_file_from_path: 5
 LSMs: 3 loadpin, selinux, + ima
 
 Mimi
+
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index bd8f52a..e84e8ba 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -9,25 +9,10 @@
  "ref\020171115175246.GN729@wotan.suse.de\0"
  "ref\01510775817.3711.315.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\020171115204651.GO729@wotan.suse.de\0"
- "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: Firmware signing -- Re: [PATCH 00/27] security, efi: Add kernel lockdown\0"
+ "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0"
+ "Subject\0Firmware signing -- Re: [PATCH 00/27] security, efi: Add kernel lockdown\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:05:01 -0500\0"
- "To\0Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>"
-  Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
-  Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
-  David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-  Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
-  AKASHI
-  Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
-  Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-  Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
-  Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
-  Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>
-  Gary Lin <GLin@suse.com>
-  LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
-  linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
- " Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:46 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:\n"
@@ -44,13 +29,13 @@
  "> > > > > \n"
  "> > > > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=90a53e4432b12288316efaa5f308adafb8d304b0\n"
  "> > > > \n"
- "> > > > Johannes was tired of waiting? \302\240Commit 5a9196d \"ima: add support for\n"
+ "> > > > Johannes was tired of waiting? ?Commit 5a9196d \"ima: add support for\n"
  "> > > > measuring and appraising firmware\" has been in the kernel since linux-\n"
  "> > > > 3.17.\n"
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > The original firmware hook for verifying firmware signatures were\n"
  "> > > > replaced with the common LSM pre and post kernel_read_file() hooks\n"
- "> > > > in\302\240linux-4.6.y.\n"
+ "> > > > in?linux-4.6.y.\n"
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > Even if you wanted to support firmware signature verification without\n"
  "> > > > IMA-appraisal, it should be using the LSM hooks.\n"
@@ -65,7 +50,7 @@
  "> > kernel_read_file_from_path(), not as a stand alone verification.\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > Why not extend kernel_read_file_from_path() to pass the detached signature?\n"
- "> >\302\240Since the signature would only be used for the verification, there's no need\n"
+ "> >?Since the signature would only be used for the verification, there's no need\n"
  "> > to return the open file descriptor.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> This goes along with the question if there were an other users who wanted it,\n"
@@ -80,18 +65,23 @@
  "> systems pegged with \"trusted boot\" have nothing to do validation of these files\n"
  "> through hardware.\n"
  "\n"
- "No, it has nothing to do with other users wanting it. \302\240It has to do\n"
+ "No, it has nothing to do with other users wanting it. ?It has to do\n"
  "with extending an API to support detach signatures.\n"
  "\n"
  "There's no reason to define a new function named\n"
- "kernel_read_file_from_path_signed(). \302\240To prevent code duplication, the\n"
- "existing functions would turn into wrappers. \302\240It's not like there are\n"
- "that many users. \302\240A quick search returned:\n"
+ "kernel_read_file_from_path_signed(). ?To prevent code duplication, the\n"
+ "existing functions would turn into wrappers. ?It's not like there are\n"
+ "that many users. ?A quick search returned:\n"
  "\n"
- "kernel_read_file_from_fd: \302\2402\n"
+ "kernel_read_file_from_fd: ?2\n"
  "kernel_read_file_from_path: 5\n"
  "LSMs: 3 loadpin, selinux, + ima\n"
  "\n"
- Mimi
+ "Mimi\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-f318dd6b654c177474f0f6a3be6ed9708b5dacb15036363d484cd51fe400a14a
+c46d1ef0dcd8e6fa5e726be61085e20c6b658808d7ea4ba8a52a7852e62128e2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.