All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1511186020.4729.66.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d7e556f..e779469 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
 
 There are a number of people interested in extending CPIO to support
 extended attributes, not just for IMA-appraisal. (Years ago I started
-but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.)  Isn't the right
+but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.) ?Isn't the right
 solution to add extended attribute support to CPIO?
 
 > The second reason is that appraisal has to be temporarily disabled
@@ -37,8 +37,13 @@ keyring, it is safe to load them on the IMA keyring without first
 validating the file signature.
 
 Once a public key is loaded on the IMA keyring, all other file
-signatures can be appraised.  There's no need for treating the digest
+signatures can be appraised. ?There's no need for treating the digest
 list file any differently than other files, as there is for the x509
 certificate.
 
 Mimi
+
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 6da2661..41c8a9a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,17 +3,10 @@
  "ref\020171118042030.GA13456@mail.hallyn.com\0"
  "ref\01511047410.5920.111.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\0175600e1-c472-69fc-2b4d-4255d8e827b5@huawei.com\0"
- "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ima: add parser of digest lists metadata\0"
+ "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v2 06/15] ima: add parser of digest lists metadata\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:53:40 -0500\0"
- "To\0Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>"
- " Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
-  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
- " silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:\n"
@@ -39,7 +32,7 @@
  "\n"
  "There are a number of people interested in extending CPIO to support\n"
  "extended attributes, not just for IMA-appraisal. (Years ago I started\n"
- "but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.)  Isn't the right\n"
+ "but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.) ?Isn't the right\n"
  "solution to add extended attribute support to CPIO?\n"
  "\n"
  "> The second reason is that appraisal has to be temporarily disabled\n"
@@ -55,10 +48,15 @@
  "validating the file signature.\n"
  "\n"
  "Once a public key is loaded on the IMA keyring, all other file\n"
- "signatures can be appraised.  There's no need for treating the digest\n"
+ "signatures can be appraised. ?There's no need for treating the digest\n"
  "list file any differently than other files, as there is for the x509\n"
  "certificate.\n"
  "\n"
- Mimi
+ "Mimi\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-ab3eb14bd11ba25906fa291d1be6f42aef53dd9a02b0a50afdfb05c361f77f13
+850804438f4e11824c044c5a18239a76e106e6307f959f9f5e3f564bf548d0a7

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index d7e556f..59747bc 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 10:40 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
 
 There are a number of people interested in extending CPIO to support
 extended attributes, not just for IMA-appraisal. (Years ago I started
-but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.)  Isn't the right
+but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.)  Isn't the right
 solution to add extended attribute support to CPIO?
 
 > The second reason is that appraisal has to be temporarily disabled
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ keyring, it is safe to load them on the IMA keyring without first
 validating the file signature.
 
 Once a public key is loaded on the IMA keyring, all other file
-signatures can be appraised.  There's no need for treating the digest
+signatures can be appraised.  There's no need for treating the digest
 list file any differently than other files, as there is for the x509
 certificate.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 6da2661..da15e12 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
  "\n"
  "There are a number of people interested in extending CPIO to support\n"
  "extended attributes, not just for IMA-appraisal. (Years ago I started\n"
- "but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.)  Isn't the right\n"
+ "but unfortunately haven't had time to finish it.) \302\240Isn't the right\n"
  "solution to add extended attribute support to CPIO?\n"
  "\n"
  "> The second reason is that appraisal has to be temporarily disabled\n"
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@
  "validating the file signature.\n"
  "\n"
  "Once a public key is loaded on the IMA keyring, all other file\n"
- "signatures can be appraised.  There's no need for treating the digest\n"
+ "signatures can be appraised. \302\240There's no need for treating the digest\n"
  "list file any differently than other files, as there is for the x509\n"
  "certificate.\n"
  "\n"
  Mimi
 
-ab3eb14bd11ba25906fa291d1be6f42aef53dd9a02b0a50afdfb05c361f77f13
+a2d380c677fd58228d956e3d149ef9cfbb361a2d9efc6e01e40a0c89e9ba6f01

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.