All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alex.chen@huawei.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	ge.changwei@h3c.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jiangqi903@gmail.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, junxiao.bi@oracle.com,
	mfasheh@versity.com, piaojun@huawei.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:39:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511339968150187@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ocfs2-should-wait-dio-before-inode-lock-in-ocfs2_setattr.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 28f5a8a7c033cbf3e32277f4cc9c6afd74f05300 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: alex chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:31:40 -0800
Subject: ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()

From: alex chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>

commit 28f5a8a7c033cbf3e32277f4cc9c6afd74f05300 upstream.

we should wait dio requests to finish before inode lock in
ocfs2_setattr(), otherwise the following deadlock will happen:

process 1                  process 2                    process 3
truncate file 'A'          end_io of writing file 'A'   receiving the bast messages
ocfs2_setattr
 ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker
  ocfs2_inode_lock_full
 inode_dio_wait
  __inode_dio_wait
  -->waiting for all dio
  requests finish
                                                        dlm_proxy_ast_handler
                                                         dlm_do_local_bast
                                                          ocfs2_blocking_ast
                                                           ocfs2_generic_handle_bast
                                                            set OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag
                        dio_end_io
                         dio_bio_end_aio
                          dio_complete
                           ocfs2_dio_end_io
                            ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
                             ocfs2_inode_lock
                              __ocfs2_cluster_lock
                               ocfs2_wait_for_mask
                               -->waiting for OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED
                               flag to be cleared, that is waiting
                               for 'process 1' unlocking the inode lock
                           inode_dio_end
                           -->here dec the i_dio_count, but will never
                           be called, so a deadlock happened.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/59F81636.70508@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ocfs2/file.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -1168,6 +1168,13 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 	}
 	size_change = S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE;
 	if (size_change) {
+		/*
+		 * Here we should wait dio to finish before inode lock
+		 * to avoid a deadlock between ocfs2_setattr() and
+		 * ocfs2_dio_end_io_write()
+		 */
+		inode_dio_wait(inode);
+
 		status = ocfs2_rw_lock(inode, 1);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mlog_errno(status);
@@ -1207,8 +1214,6 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 		if (status)
 			goto bail_unlock;
 
-		inode_dio_wait(inode);
-
 		if (i_size_read(inode) >= attr->ia_size) {
 			if (ocfs2_should_order_data(inode)) {
 				status = ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate(inode,


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from alex.chen@huawei.com are

queue-4.13/ocfs2-should-wait-dio-before-inode-lock-in-ocfs2_setattr.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1511339968150187@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.chen@huawei.com \
    --cc=ge.changwei@h3c.com \
    --cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=mfasheh@versity.com \
    --cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.