From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, christopher.s.hall@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: WTF: patch "[PATCH] timekeeping: Eliminate the stale declaration of" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.14-stable tree?
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511790737184214@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.14-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 8a7a8e1eab929eb3a5b735a788a23b9731139046 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:49:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Eliminate the stale declaration of
ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64()
Commit ba26621e63ce got rid of ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(), but left its
declaration behind.
Remove it.
Fixes: ba26621e63ce ("time: Remove duplicated code in ktime_get_raw_and_real()")
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Christopher S. Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
Cc: joelaf@google.com
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: deepa.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510552144-20831-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
index 0021575fe871..51293e1aa4da 100644
--- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
+++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
@@ -272,12 +272,6 @@ extern bool timekeeping_rtc_skipresume(void);
extern void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta);
-/*
- * PPS accessor
- */
-extern void ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts_raw,
- struct timespec64 *ts_real);
-
/*
* struct system_time_snapshot - simultaneous raw/real time capture with
* counter value
reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511790737184214@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.