From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: henrik.eriksson@axis.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, tiwai@suse.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ALSA: pcm: update tstamp only if audio_tstamp changed" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:06:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151179876320044@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ALSA: pcm: update tstamp only if audio_tstamp changed
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
alsa-pcm-update-tstamp-only-if-audio_tstamp-changed.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 20e3f985bb875fea4f86b04eba4b6cc29bfd6b71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henrik Eriksson <henrik.eriksson@axis.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:29:28 +0100
Subject: ALSA: pcm: update tstamp only if audio_tstamp changed
From: Henrik Eriksson <henrik.eriksson@axis.com>
commit 20e3f985bb875fea4f86b04eba4b6cc29bfd6b71 upstream.
commit 3179f6200188 ("ALSA: core: add .get_time_info") had a side effect
of changing the behaviour of the PCM runtime tstamp. Prior to this
change tstamp was not updated by snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0() unless the
hw_ptr had moved, after this change tstamp was always updated.
For an application using alsa-lib, doing snd_pcm_readi() followed by
snd_pcm_status() to estimate the age of the read samples by subtracting
status->avail * [sample rate] from status->tstamp this change degraded
the accuracy of the estimate on devices where the pcm hw does not
provide a granular hw_ptr, e.g., devices using
soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c and a dma-engine with residue_granularity
DMA_RESIDUE_GRANULARITY_DESCRIPTOR. The accuracy of the estimate
depended on the latency between the PCM hw completing a period and the
driver called snd_pcm_period_elapsed() to notify ALSA core, typically
determined by interrupt handling latency. After the change the accuracy
of the estimate depended on the latency between the PCM hw completing a
period and the application calling snd_pcm_status(), determined by the
scheduling of the application process. The maximum error of the
estimate is one period length in both cases, but the error average and
variance is smaller when it depends on interrupt latency.
Instead of always updating tstamp, update it only if audio_tstamp
changed.
Fixes: 3179f6200188 ("ALSA: core: add .get_time_info")
Suggested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Henrik Eriksson <henrik.eriksson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
@@ -264,8 +264,10 @@ static void update_audio_tstamp(struct s
runtime->rate);
*audio_tstamp = ns_to_timespec(audio_nsecs);
}
- runtime->status->audio_tstamp = *audio_tstamp;
- runtime->status->tstamp = *curr_tstamp;
+ if (!timespec_equal(&runtime->status->audio_tstamp, audio_tstamp)) {
+ runtime->status->audio_tstamp = *audio_tstamp;
+ runtime->status->tstamp = *curr_tstamp;
+ }
/*
* re-take a driver timestamp to let apps detect if the reference tstamp
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from henrik.eriksson@axis.com are
queue-4.4/alsa-pcm-update-tstamp-only-if-audio_tstamp-changed.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151179876320044@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=henrik.eriksson@axis.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.