Patch "powerpc/64s/hash: Fix 128TB-512TB virtual address boundary case allocation" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    powerpc/64s/hash: Fix 128TB-512TB virtual address boundary case allocation

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     powerpc-64s-hash-fix-128tb-512tb-virtual-address-boundary-case-allocation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 6a72dc038b615229a1b285829d6c8378d15c2347 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:27:36 +1100
Subject: powerpc/64s/hash: Fix 128TB-512TB virtual address boundary case allocation

From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

commit 6a72dc038b615229a1b285829d6c8378d15c2347 upstream.

When allocating VA space with a hint that crosses 128TB, the SLB
addr_limit variable is not expanded if addr is not > 128TB, but the
slice allocation looks at task_size, which is 512TB. This results in
slice_check_fit() incorrectly succeeding because the slice_count
truncates off bit 128 of the requested mask, so the comparison to the
available mask succeeds.

Fix this by using mm->context.addr_limit instead of mm->task_size for
testing allocation limits. This causes such allocations to fail.

Fixes: f4ea6dcb08ea ("powerpc/mm: Enable mappings above 128TB")
Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int slice_area_is_free(struct mm_
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
-	if ((mm->task_size - len) < addr)
+	if ((mm->context.addr_limit - len) < addr)
 		return 0;
 	vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
 	return (!vma || (addr + len) <= vm_start_gap(vma));
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static void slice_mask_for_free(struct m
 		if (!slice_low_has_vma(mm, i))
 			ret->low_slices |= 1u << i;
 
-	if (mm->task_size <= SLICE_LOW_TOP)
+	if (mm->context.addr_limit <= SLICE_LOW_TOP)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(mm->context.addr_limit); i++)
@@ -412,25 +412,31 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(un
 	struct slice_mask compat_mask;
 	int fixed = (flags & MAP_FIXED);
 	int pshift = max_t(int, mmu_psize_defs[psize].shift, PAGE_SHIFT);
+	unsigned long page_size = 1UL << pshift;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 	unsigned long newaddr;
 	unsigned long high_limit;
 
-	/*
-	 * Check if we need to expland slice area.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(addr >= mm->context.addr_limit &&
-		     mm->context.addr_limit != TASK_SIZE)) {
-		mm->context.addr_limit = TASK_SIZE;
+	high_limit = DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW;
+	if (addr >= high_limit)
+		high_limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	if (len > high_limit)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (len & (page_size - 1))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (fixed) {
+		if (addr & (page_size - 1))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (addr > high_limit - len)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	if (high_limit > mm->context.addr_limit) {
+		mm->context.addr_limit = high_limit;
 		on_each_cpu(slice_flush_segments, mm, 1);
 	}
-	/*
-	 * This mmap request can allocate upt to 512TB
-	 */
-	if (addr >= DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW)
-		high_limit = mm->context.addr_limit;
-	else
-		high_limit = DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW;
+
 	/*
 	 * init different masks
 	 */
@@ -446,27 +452,19 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(un
 
 	/* Sanity checks */
 	BUG_ON(mm->task_size == 0);
+	BUG_ON(mm->context.addr_limit == 0);
 	VM_BUG_ON(radix_enabled());
 
 	slice_dbg("slice_get_unmapped_area(mm=%p, psize=%d...\n", mm, psize);
 	slice_dbg(" addr=%lx, len=%lx, flags=%lx, topdown=%d\n",
 		  addr, len, flags, topdown);
 
-	if (len > mm->task_size)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	if (len & ((1ul << pshift) - 1))
-		return -EINVAL;
-	if (fixed && (addr & ((1ul << pshift) - 1)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-	if (fixed && addr > (mm->task_size - len))
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	/* If hint, make sure it matches our alignment restrictions */
 	if (!fixed && addr) {
-		addr = _ALIGN_UP(addr, 1ul << pshift);
+		addr = _ALIGN_UP(addr, page_size);
 		slice_dbg(" aligned addr=%lx\n", addr);
 		/* Ignore hint if it's too large or overlaps a VMA */
-		if (addr > mm->task_size - len ||
+		if (addr > high_limit - len ||
 		    !slice_area_is_free(mm, addr, len))
 			addr = 0;
 	}


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from npiggin@gmail.com are

queue-4.14/powerpc-64s-hash-fix-128tb-512tb-virtual-address-boundary-case-allocation.patch
queue-4.14/powerpc-64s-hash-fix-fork-with-512tb-process-address-space.patch
queue-4.14/powerpc-64s-radix-fix-128tb-512tb-virtual-address-boundary-case-allocation.patch
queue-4.14/powerpc-64s-hash-allow-map_fixed-allocations-to-cross-128tb-boundary.patch
queue-4.14/powerpc-64s-hash-fix-512t-hint-detection-to-use-128t.patch