From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:59:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511899194.19952.43.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw5DAB6qZu4fmDTvhU-wB4zNhUGuBBdBzMnh5d=ybBj-g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:10 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > The notation in question has been standard in tools like lint since the
> > end of the 1970s
>
> Yes.
>
> That said, maybe one option would be to annotate the "case:" and
> "default:" statements if that makes people happier.
>
> IOW, we could do something like
>
> #define fallthrough __atttibute__((fallthrough))
>
> and then write
>
> fallthrough case 1:
> ...
>
> which while absolutely not traditional, might look and read a bit more
> logical to people. I mean, it literally _is_ a "fallthrough case", so
> it makes semantic sense.
>
> Or maybe people hate that kind of "making up new syntax" too?
I don't
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/10/485
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 23:52 [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-28 13:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:05 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-28 18:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:22 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-28 18:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 18:53 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-28 19:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 19:00 ` Alan Cox
2017-11-28 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 19:59 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-11-28 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 20:34 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-28 20:37 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-29 1:07 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-29 8:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-11-28 20:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 20:25 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-28 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-29 15:10 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-29 15:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-30 0:21 ` Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-29 23:56 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-01-30 0:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511899194.19952.43.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.