From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: wangnan0@huawei.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com,
khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, liubo95@huawei.com, mhocko@suse.com,
minchan@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent leaking TLB entry" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 09:43:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151220782284155@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 687cb0884a714ff484d038e9190edc874edcf146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:09:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent leaking TLB entry
tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1) means gathering the whole virtual memory
space. In this case, tlb->fullmm is true. Some archs like arm64
doesn't flush TLB when tlb->fullmm is true:
commit 5a7862e83000 ("arm64: tlbflush: avoid flushing when fullmm == 1").
Which causes leaking of tlb entries.
Will clarifies his patch:
"Basically, we tag each address space with an ASID (PCID on x86) which
is resident in the TLB. This means we can elide TLB invalidation when
pulling down a full mm because we won't ever assign that ASID to
another mm without doing TLB invalidation elsewhere (which actually
just nukes the whole TLB).
I think that means that we could potentially not fault on a kernel
uaccess, because we could hit in the TLB"
There could be a window between complete_signal() sending IPI to other
cores and all threads sharing this mm are really kicked off from cores.
In this window, the oom reaper may calls tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() to
flush TLB then frees pages. However, due to the above problem, the TLB
entries are not really flushed on arm64. Other threads are possible to
access these pages through TLB entries. Moreover, a copy_to_user() can
also write to these pages without generating page fault, causes
use-after-free bugs.
This patch gathers each vma instead of gathering full vm space. In this
case tlb->fullmm is not true. The behavior of oom reaper become similar
to munmapping before do_exit, which should be safe for all archs.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171107095453.179940-1-wangnan0@huawei.com
Fixes: aac453635549 ("mm, oom: introduce oom reaper")
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <liubo95@huawei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index c86fbd1b590e..c957be32b27a 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -550,7 +550,6 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
- tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma))
continue;
@@ -565,11 +564,13 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
* we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref
* count elevated without a good reason.
*/
- if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+ if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
+ tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
NULL);
+ tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
+ }
}
- tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
pr_info("oom_reaper: reaped process %d (%s), now anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB\n",
task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm,
K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES)),
next reply other threads:[~2017-12-02 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-02 9:43 gregkh [this message]
2017-12-05 9:39 ` [PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent leaking TLB entry Michal Hocko
2017-12-05 17:10 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151220782284155@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=liubo95@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.