From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: robin.murphy@arm.com, Harsh@chelsio.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:53:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151302919081152@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
iommu-vt-d-fix-scatterlist-offset-handling.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 29a90b70893817e2f2bb3cea40a29f5308e21b21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:14:01 +0100
Subject: iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
commit 29a90b70893817e2f2bb3cea40a29f5308e21b21 upstream.
The intel-iommu DMA ops fail to correctly handle scatterlists where
sg->offset is greater than PAGE_SIZE - the IOVA allocation is computed
appropriately based on the page-aligned portion of the offset, but the
mapping is set up relative to sg->page, which means it fails to actually
cover the whole buffer (and in the worst case doesn't cover it at all):
(sg->dma_address + sg->dma_len) ----+
sg->dma_address ---------+ |
iov_pfn------+ | |
| | |
v v v
iova: a b c d e f
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
<...calculated....>
[_____mapped______]
pfn: 0 1 2 3 4 5
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
^ ^ ^
| | |
sg->page ----+ | |
sg->offset --------------+ |
(sg->offset + sg->length) ----------+
As a result, the caller ends up overrunning the mapping into whatever
lies beyond, which usually goes badly:
[ 429.645492] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
[ 429.650847] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [02:00.4] fault addr f2682000 ...
Whilst this is a fairly rare occurrence, it can happen from the result
of intermediate scatterlist processing such as scatterwalk_ffwd() in the
crypto layer. Whilst that particular site could be fixed up, it still
seems worthwhile to bring intel-iommu in line with other DMA API
implementations in handling this robustly.
To that end, fix the intel_map_sg() path to line up the mapping
correctly (in units of MM pages rather than VT-d pages to match the
aligned_nrpages() calculation) regardless of the offset, and use
sg_phys() consistently for clarity.
Reported-by: Harsh Jain <Harsh@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Tested by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -2254,10 +2254,12 @@ static int __domain_mapping(struct dmar_
uint64_t tmp;
if (!sg_res) {
+ unsigned int pgoff = sg->offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
+
sg_res = aligned_nrpages(sg->offset, sg->length);
- sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + sg->offset;
+ sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + pgoff;
sg->dma_length = sg->length;
- pteval = page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) | prot;
+ pteval = (sg_phys(sg) - pgoff) | prot;
phys_pfn = pteval >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT;
}
@@ -3790,7 +3792,7 @@ static int intel_nontranslate_map_sg(str
for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
BUG_ON(!sg_page(sg));
- sg->dma_address = page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
+ sg->dma_address = sg_phys(sg);
sg->dma_length = sg->length;
}
return nelems;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from robin.murphy@arm.com are
queue-4.14/iommu-vt-d-fix-scatterlist-offset-handling.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151302919081152@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Harsh@chelsio.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.