From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sean@mess.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[media] lirc: fix dead lock between open and wakeup_filter" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:33:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151308201524672@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[media] lirc: fix dead lock between open and wakeup_filter
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
lirc-fix-dead-lock-between-open-and-wakeup_filter.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Dec 12 13:26:17 CET 2017
From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:35:44 -0200
Subject: [media] lirc: fix dead lock between open and wakeup_filter
From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
[ Upstream commit db5b15b74ed9a5c04bb808d18ffa2c773f5c18c0 ]
The locking in lirc needs improvement, but for now just fix this potential
deadlock.
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
4.10.0-rc1+ #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/2502 is trying to acquire lock:
(ir_raw_handler_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc06f6a5e>] ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
but task is already holding lock:
(&dev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc06f511f>] store_filter+0x9f/0x240 [rc_core]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&dev->lock){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffffa110adad>] lock_acquire+0xfd/0x200
[<ffffffffa1921327>] mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x6d0
[<ffffffffc06f436a>] rc_open+0x2a/0x80 [rc_core]
[<ffffffffc07114ca>] lirc_dev_fop_open+0xda/0x1e0 [lirc_dev]
[<ffffffffa12975e0>] chrdev_open+0xb0/0x210
[<ffffffffa128eb5a>] do_dentry_open+0x20a/0x2f0
[<ffffffffa128ffcc>] vfs_open+0x4c/0x80
[<ffffffffa12a35ec>] path_openat+0x5bc/0xc00
[<ffffffffa12a5271>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
[<ffffffffa12903f0>] do_sys_open+0x130/0x220
[<ffffffffa12904fe>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffffa19278c1>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
-> #1 (lirc_dev_lock){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffffa110adad>] lock_acquire+0xfd/0x200
[<ffffffffa1921327>] mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x6d0
[<ffffffffc0711f47>] lirc_register_driver+0x67/0x59b [lirc_dev]
[<ffffffffc06db7f4>] ir_lirc_register+0x1f4/0x260 [ir_lirc_codec]
[<ffffffffc06f6cac>] ir_raw_handler_register+0x7c/0xb0 [rc_core]
[<ffffffffc0398010>] 0xffffffffc0398010
[<ffffffffa1002192>] do_one_initcall+0x52/0x1b0
[<ffffffffa11ef5c8>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1fa
[<ffffffffa11566b5>] load_module+0x2675/0x2b00
[<ffffffffa1156dcf>] SYSC_finit_module+0xdf/0x110
[<ffffffffa1156e1e>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffffa1003f5c>] do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x1f0
[<ffffffffa1927989>] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a
-> #0 (ir_raw_handler_lock){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffffa110a7b7>] __lock_acquire+0x10f7/0x1290
[<ffffffffa110adad>] lock_acquire+0xfd/0x200
[<ffffffffa1921327>] mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x6d0
[<ffffffffc06f6a5e>] ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
[<ffffffffc0b0f492>] loop_set_wakeup_filter+0x62/0xbd [rc_loopback]
[<ffffffffc06f522a>] store_filter+0x1aa/0x240 [rc_core]
[<ffffffffa15e46f8>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
[<ffffffffa13318e5>] sysfs_kf_write+0x45/0x60
[<ffffffffa1330b55>] kernfs_fop_write+0x155/0x1e0
[<ffffffffa1290797>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x160
[<ffffffffa12921f8>] vfs_write+0xc8/0x1e0
[<ffffffffa12936e8>] SyS_write+0x58/0xc0
[<ffffffffa19278c1>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
ir_raw_handler_lock --> lirc_dev_lock --> &dev->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&dev->lock);
lock(lirc_dev_lock);
lock(&dev->lock);
lock(ir_raw_handler_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by bash/2502:
#0: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffa12922c5>] vfs_write+0x195/0x1e0
#1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa1330b1f>] kernfs_fop_write+0x11f/0x1e0
#2: (s_active#215){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffa1330b28>] kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x1e0
#3: (&dev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc06f511f>] store_filter+0x9f/0x240 [rc_core]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 2502 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-rc1+ #1
Hardware name: /DG45ID, BIOS IDG4510H.86A.0135.2011.0225.1100 02/25/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
print_circular_bug+0x1be/0x210
__lock_acquire+0x10f7/0x1290
lock_acquire+0xfd/0x200
? ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
? ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x6d0
? ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
? loop_set_wakeup_filter+0x44/0xbd [rc_loopback]
ir_raw_encode_scancode+0x3e/0xb0 [rc_core]
loop_set_wakeup_filter+0x62/0xbd [rc_loopback]
? loop_set_tx_duty_cycle+0x70/0x70 [rc_loopback]
store_filter+0x1aa/0x240 [rc_core]
dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
sysfs_kf_write+0x45/0x60
kernfs_fop_write+0x155/0x1e0
__vfs_write+0x37/0x160
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4a/0x80
? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2f/0x60
? __sb_start_write+0x10c/0x220
? vfs_write+0x195/0x1e0
? security_file_permission+0x3b/0xc0
vfs_write+0xc8/0x1e0
SyS_write+0x58/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
@@ -446,6 +446,8 @@ int lirc_dev_fop_open(struct inode *inod
return -ERESTARTSYS;
ir = irctls[iminor(inode)];
+ mutex_unlock(&lirc_dev_lock);
+
if (!ir) {
retval = -ENODEV;
goto error;
@@ -486,8 +488,6 @@ int lirc_dev_fop_open(struct inode *inod
}
error:
- mutex_unlock(&lirc_dev_lock);
-
nonseekable_open(inode, file);
return retval;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from sean@mess.org are
queue-4.9/lirc-fix-dead-lock-between-open-and-wakeup_filter.patch
queue-4.9/media-dvb-i2c-transfers-over-usb-cannot-be-done-from-stack.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151308201524672@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.