Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q/thermal: imx: move CPU cooling device from thermal to cpufreq

[Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>]

On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 02:00 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 12:49:18 PM CET Shawn Guo wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:23:32AM +0100, Bastian Stender wrote:
> > > 
> > > The cooling device should be part of the i.MX cpufreq driver. So move
> > > it there.
> > > 
> > > Use of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register to link the cooling device to the
> > > device tree node provided.
> > > 
> > > This makes it possible to bind the cpufreq cooling device to a custom
> > > thermal zone via a cooling-maps entry like:
> > > 
> > > 	cooling-maps {
> > > 		map0 {
> > > 			trip = <&board_alert>;
> > > 			cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> > > 		};
> > > 	};
> > > 
> > > Assuming a cpu node exists with label "cpu0" and #cooling-cells
> > > property.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de>

> > I'm fine with the patch, but I would invite Leonard to take a look.

> Given no response, what should I do?

Sorry for keeping you waiting. I don't much about the "cooling device"
infrastructure so I don't have much to add, I guess I assumed a reply
wasn't required?

Looking at the code you are removing "thermal_cooling_device *cdev;"
from imx_thermal_data but kept "cpufreq_policy *policy". Isn't that
unused now?

Also, your code only adds the cooling device if certain devicetree
properties are present. Shouldn't your patch come with imx6*.dtsi
changes, or make the capacitance value default to zero somehow?
Otherwise the effect of the patch on most boards would be to disable
cpufreq cooling.

--
Regards,
Leonard