From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dbanerje@akamai.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Fix handling of verdicts after NF_QUEUE" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:43:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151327338481192@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213203337.314-1-dbanerje@akamai.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Fix handling of verdicts after NF_QUEUE
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fix-handling-of-verdicts-after-nf_queue.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From dbanerje@akamai.com Thu Dec 14 18:38:57 2017
From: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:33:37 -0500
Subject: Fix handling of verdicts after NF_QUEUE
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, dbanerje@akamai.com
Message-ID: <20171213203337.314-1-dbanerje@akamai.com>
From: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>
[This fix is only needed for v4.9 stable since v4.10+ does not have the issue]
A verdict of NF_STOLEN after NF_QUEUE will cause an incorrect return value
and a potential kernel panic via double free of skb's
This was broken by commit 7034b566a4e7 ("netfilter: fix nf_queue handling")
and subsequently fixed in v4.10 by commit c63cbc460419 ("netfilter:
use switch() to handle verdict cases from nf_hook_slow()"). However that
commit cannot be cleanly cherry-picked to v4.9
Signed-off-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/core.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -364,6 +364,11 @@ next_hook:
ret = nf_queue(skb, state, &entry, verdict);
if (ret == 1 && entry)
goto next_hook;
+ } else {
+ /* Implicit handling for NF_STOLEN, as well as any other
+ * non conventional verdicts.
+ */
+ ret = 0;
}
return ret;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dbanerje@akamai.com are
queue-4.9/fix-handling-of-verdicts-after-nf_queue.patch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 20:33 [PATCH] Fix handling of verdicts after NF_QUEUE Debabrata Banerjee
2017-12-14 12:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-12-14 17:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-14 17:43 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151327338481192@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbanerje@akamai.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.