Re: [morty][PATCH v2] Make ti-xdctools a native recipe

[Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 17:59 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:53:08PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 17:39 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > > Thanks! Can you please detail the changes between v1 and v2 of
> > > the
> > > patch? We 
> > > are still investigating v1 of the patch and how it affects our
> > > releases...
> > 
> > Sorry, just rebased and took the opertunity to add the branch
> > specifier
> > (morty) to the patch subject since I forgot it the first time.
> > There
> > are no functional changes.
> 
> Thanks, have you tried building anything with this change?
> 
> Right off the bat it breaks ipumm-fw, as it expects xdctools to
> reside in the 
> same sysroot as BIOS, which is the target one. Fixing it.

Hmm... thats odd. I'm though we were building the ipumm-fw recipe...
maybe not though. We are a ways behind on the morty branch right now
(which is where our patch was based originally). I'll make sure to get
us up to the HEAD and try it on Monday.

> 
> Also, I'm making corresponding changes in meta-arago, which uses
> xdctools as 
> well. Hopefully there's not much breakage there...
> 

We don't use much of meta-arago (our distro is poky based), but we do
"cherry-pick" most of the non-qt based recipes through a rather ugly
process from meta-arago-extra (I don't know if they all build though).
On a side note, optional Qt support in meta-arago would be *greatly*
appreciated :)

Thanks,
Joshua Watt