From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: knut.omang@oracle.com (Knut Omang)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:36:54 +0100
Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH v2 2/5] Documentation: Add doc for runchecks
In-Reply-To: <4fe0691a-ca79-6bfc-918c-77c109ac14b3@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <7bd67f980fdf33031c54955f7e04b435c267886e.1513430008.git-series.knut.omang@oracle.com>
 <4be59ef0-50a9-83f5-2cf1-f5a34e5810a7@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1513441576.31439.33.camel@oracle.com>
 <4fe0691a-ca79-6bfc-918c-77c109ac14b3@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1513445814.31439.41.camel@oracle.com>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 18:19 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I'll take these in for v3 as well
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> > and carefully review myself for any further errors of the same sorts..
> 
> I found it surprising that so many update candidates were left over
> still in the second version of this text (while tags were already present
> from three reviewers).
> 
> I assume that other wording adjustments could eventually be considered
> at a few places.

I am afraid most of it came due to the changes I made to go from supporting just
checkpatch to support many checkers from v1 to v2, so I have to take the sole
responsibility...

Thanks,
Knut

> 
> Regards,
> Markus