From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: knut.omang@oracle.com (Knut Omang) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 03:19:13 +0100 Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH v2 2/5] Documentation: Add doc for runchecks In-Reply-To: References: <7bd67f980fdf33031c54955f7e04b435c267886e.1513430008.git-series.knut.omang@oracle.com> <4be59ef0-50a9-83f5-2cf1-f5a34e5810a7@users.sourceforge.net> <1513441576.31439.33.camel@oracle.com> <4fe0691a-ca79-6bfc-918c-77c109ac14b3@users.sourceforge.net> <1513445814.31439.41.camel@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1513477153.31439.112.camel@oracle.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 18:50 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> I assume that other wording adjustments could eventually be considered > >> at a few places. > > > > I am afraid most of it came due to the changes I made to go from supporting just > > checkpatch to support many checkers from v1 to v2, so I have to take the sole > > responsibility... > > Thanks for your clarification. > > You showed a promising start for another software evolution. > My own understanding level might be also still incomplete in this case. > > Do you plan any extensions for higher level descriptions? I am itching to implement more features :-) I already have some ideas and I am happy to take more, I just want the basis to get in first, so I am sure I don't waste my time.. Thanks, Knut > Regards, > Markus