From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: changbin.du@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "tracing: Allocate mask_str buffer dynamically" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:43:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513597411198173@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tracing: Allocate mask_str buffer dynamically
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tracing-allocate-mask_str-buffer-dynamically.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 90e406f96f630c07d631a021fd4af10aac913e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:39:43 +0800
Subject: tracing: Allocate mask_str buffer dynamically
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
commit 90e406f96f630c07d631a021fd4af10aac913e77 upstream.
The default NR_CPUS can be very large, but actual possible nr_cpu_ids
usually is very small. For my x86 distribution, the NR_CPUS is 8192 and
nr_cpu_ids is 4. About 2 pages are wasted.
Most machines don't have so many CPUs, so define a array with NR_CPUS
just wastes memory. So let's allocate the buffer dynamically when need.
With this change, the mutext tracing_cpumask_update_lock also can be
removed now, which was used to protect mask_str.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512013183-19107-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com
Fixes: 36dfe9252bd4c ("ftrace: make use of tracing_cpumask")
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3384,37 +3384,30 @@ static const struct file_operations show
.llseek = seq_lseek,
};
-/*
- * The tracer itself will not take this lock, but still we want
- * to provide a consistent cpumask to user-space:
- */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
-
-/*
- * Temporary storage for the character representation of the
- * CPU bitmask (and one more byte for the newline):
- */
-static char mask_str[NR_CPUS + 1];
-
static ssize_t
tracing_cpumask_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct trace_array *tr = file_inode(filp)->i_private;
+ char *mask_str;
int len;
- mutex_lock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
+ len = snprintf(NULL, 0, "%*pb\n",
+ cpumask_pr_args(tr->tracing_cpumask)) + 1;
+ mask_str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mask_str)
+ return -ENOMEM;
- len = snprintf(mask_str, count, "%*pb\n",
+ len = snprintf(mask_str, len, "%*pb\n",
cpumask_pr_args(tr->tracing_cpumask));
if (len >= count) {
count = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
- count = simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, mask_str, NR_CPUS+1);
+ count = simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, mask_str, len);
out_err:
- mutex_unlock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
+ kfree(mask_str);
return count;
}
@@ -3434,8 +3427,6 @@ tracing_cpumask_write(struct file *filp,
if (err)
goto err_unlock;
- mutex_lock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
-
local_irq_disable();
arch_spin_lock(&tr->max_lock);
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -3458,8 +3449,6 @@ tracing_cpumask_write(struct file *filp,
local_irq_enable();
cpumask_copy(tr->tracing_cpumask, tracing_cpumask_new);
-
- mutex_unlock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
free_cpumask_var(tracing_cpumask_new);
return count;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from changbin.du@intel.com are
queue-4.4/tracing-allocate-mask_str-buffer-dynamically.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513597411198173@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.