All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com, Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com,
	alexander.levin@verizon.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xprtrdma: Don't defer fencing an async RPC's chunks" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:59:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15136019667797@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xprtrdma: Don't defer fencing an async RPC's chunks

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xprtrdma-don-t-defer-fencing-an-async-rpc-s-chunks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 13:29:00 CET 2017
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:03:26 -0400
Subject: xprtrdma: Don't defer fencing an async RPC's chunks

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>


[ Upstream commit 8f66b1a529047a972cb9602a919c53a95f3d7a2b ]

In current kernels, waiting in xprt_release appears to be safe to
do. I had erroneously believed that for ASYNC RPCs, waiting of any
kind in xprt_release->xprt_rdma_free would result in deadlock. I've
done injection testing and consulted with Trond to confirm that
waiting in the RPC release path is safe.

For the very few times where RPC resources haven't yet been released
earlier by the reply handler, it is safe to wait synchronously in
xprt_rdma_free for invalidation rather than defering it to MR
recovery.

Note: When the QP is error state, posting a LocalInvalidate should
flush and mark the MR as bad. There is no way the remote HCA can
access that MR via a QP in error state, so it is effectively already
inaccessible and thus safe for the Upper Layer to access. The next
time the MR is used it should be recognized and cleaned up properly
by frwr_op_map.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ xprt_rdma_free(struct rpc_task *task)
 	dprintk("RPC:       %s: called on 0x%p\n", __func__, req->rl_reply);
 
 	if (!list_empty(&req->rl_registered))
-		ia->ri_ops->ro_unmap_safe(r_xprt, req, !RPC_IS_ASYNC(task));
+		ia->ri_ops->ro_unmap_sync(r_xprt, &req->rl_registered);
 	rpcrdma_unmap_sges(ia, req);
 	rpcrdma_buffer_put(req);
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chuck.lever@oracle.com are

queue-4.14/xprtrdma-don-t-defer-fencing-an-async-rpc-s-chunks.patch
queue-4.14/sunrpc-fix-a-race-in-the-receive-code-path.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15136019667797@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.