Patch "fm10k: fix mis-ordered parameters in declaration for .ndo_set_vf_bw" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    fm10k: fix mis-ordered parameters in declaration for .ndo_set_vf_bw

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     fm10k-fix-mis-ordered-parameters-in-declaration-for-.ndo_set_vf_bw.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Dec 21 09:02:40 CET 2017
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:14:58 -0700
Subject: fm10k: fix mis-ordered parameters in declaration for .ndo_set_vf_bw

From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>


[ Upstream commit 3e256ac5b1ec307e5dd5a4c99fbdbc651446c738 ]

We've had support for setting both a minimum and maximum bandwidth via
.ndo_set_vf_bw since commit 883a9ccbae56 ("fm10k: Add support for SR-IOV
to driver", 2014-09-20).

Likely because we do not support minimum rates, the declaration
mis-ordered the "unused" parameter, which causes warnings when analyzed
with cppcheck.

Fix this warning by properly declaring the min_rate and max_rate
variables in the declaration and definition (rather than using
"unused"). Also rename "rate" to max_rate so as to clarify that we only
support setting the maximum rate.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h     |    4 ++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_iov.c |    9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
@@ -508,8 +508,8 @@ s32 fm10k_iov_update_pvid(struct fm10k_i
 int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_mac(struct net_device *netdev, int vf_idx, u8 *mac);
 int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_vlan(struct net_device *netdev,
 			  int vf_idx, u16 vid, u8 qos, __be16 vlan_proto);
-int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_bw(struct net_device *netdev, int vf_idx, int rate,
-			int unused);
+int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_bw(struct net_device *netdev, int vf_idx,
+			int __always_unused min_rate, int max_rate);
 int fm10k_ndo_get_vf_config(struct net_device *netdev,
 			    int vf_idx, struct ifla_vf_info *ivi);
 
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_iov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_iov.c
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_vlan(struct net_dev
 }
 
 int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_bw(struct net_device *netdev, int vf_idx,
-			int __always_unused unused, int rate)
+			int __always_unused min_rate, int max_rate)
 {
 	struct fm10k_intfc *interface = netdev_priv(netdev);
 	struct fm10k_iov_data *iov_data = interface->iov_data;
@@ -493,14 +493,15 @@ int fm10k_ndo_set_vf_bw(struct net_devic
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* rate limit cannot be less than 10Mbs or greater than link speed */
-	if (rate && ((rate < FM10K_VF_TC_MIN) || rate > FM10K_VF_TC_MAX))
+	if (max_rate &&
+	    (max_rate < FM10K_VF_TC_MIN || max_rate > FM10K_VF_TC_MAX))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* store values */
-	iov_data->vf_info[vf_idx].rate = rate;
+	iov_data->vf_info[vf_idx].rate = max_rate;
 
 	/* update hardware configuration */
-	hw->iov.ops.configure_tc(hw, vf_idx, rate);
+	hw->iov.ops.configure_tc(hw, vf_idx, max_rate);
 
 	return 0;
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jacob.e.keller@intel.com are

queue-4.9/fm10k-fix-mis-ordered-parameters-in-declaration-for-.ndo_set_vf_bw.patch
queue-4.9/fm10k-ensure-we-process-sm-mbx-when-processing-vf-mbx.patch