From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pablo@netfilter.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, zlpnobody@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:55:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513850139164126@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-runtime-expectation-policy-updates.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 21 10:55:04 CET 2017
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:32:37 +0100
Subject: netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix runtime expectation policy updates
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
[ Upstream commit 2c422257550f123049552b39f7af6e3428a60f43 ]
We only allow runtime updates of expectation policies for timeout and
maximum number of expectations, otherwise reject the update.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Acked-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
@@ -256,6 +256,89 @@ err:
}
static int
+nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(const struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy,
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *new_policy,
+ const struct nlattr *attr)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[NFCTH_POLICY_MAX + 1];
+ int err;
+
+ err = nla_parse_nested(tb, NFCTH_POLICY_MAX, attr,
+ nfnl_cthelper_expect_pol);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_NAME] ||
+ !tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_MAX] ||
+ !tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_TIMEOUT])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (nla_strcmp(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_NAME], policy->name))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ new_policy->max_expected =
+ ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_MAX]));
+ new_policy->timeout =
+ ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_EXPECT_TIMEOUT]));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(struct nlattr *tb[],
+ struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper)
+{
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy new_policy[helper->expect_class_max + 1];
+ struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy;
+ int i, err;
+
+ /* Check first that all policy attributes are well-formed, so we don't
+ * leave things in inconsistent state on errors.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) {
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ err = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(&helper->expect_policy[i],
+ &new_policy[i],
+ tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i]);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+ }
+ /* Now we can safely update them. */
+ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) {
+ policy = (struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *)
+ &helper->expect_policy[i];
+ policy->max_expected = new_policy->max_expected;
+ policy->timeout = new_policy->timeout;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy(struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper,
+ const struct nlattr *attr)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX + 1];
+ unsigned int class_max;
+ int err;
+
+ err = nla_parse_nested(tb, NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX, attr,
+ nfnl_cthelper_expect_policy_set);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ class_max = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]));
+ if (helper->expect_class_max + 1 != class_max)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ return nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(tb, helper);
+}
+
+static int
nfnl_cthelper_update(const struct nlattr * const tb[],
struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper)
{
@@ -265,8 +348,7 @@ nfnl_cthelper_update(const struct nlattr
return -EBUSY;
if (tb[NFCTH_POLICY]) {
- ret = nfnl_cthelper_parse_expect_policy(helper,
- tb[NFCTH_POLICY]);
+ ret = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy(helper, tb[NFCTH_POLICY]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from pablo@netfilter.org are
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-runtime-expectation-policy-updates.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-a-race-when-walk-the-nf_ct_helper_hash-table.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nfnl_cthelper-fix-memory-leak.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-nf_nat_snmp-fix-panic-when-snmp_trap_helper-fails-to-register.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513850139164126@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.