From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:47:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151395766820657@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222152312.2945-4-daniel@iogearbox.net>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-s390x-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Dec 22 16:47:02 CET 2017
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:23:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, jannh@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20171222152312.2945-4-daniel@iogearbox.net>
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
[ Upstream commit 6d59b7dbf72ed20d0138e2f9b75ca3d4a9d4faca ]
The assumption of unconditionally reloading skb pointers on
BPF helper calls where bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() holds
true is wrong. There can be different contexts where the
BPF helper would enforce a reload such as in case of XDP.
Here, we do have a struct xdp_buff instead of struct sk_buff
as context, thus this will access garbage.
JITs only ever need to deal with cached skb pointer reload
when ld_abs/ind was seen, therefore guard the reload behind
SEEN_SKB only. Tested on s390x.
Fixes: 9db7f2b81880 ("s390/bpf: recache skb->data/hlen for skb_vlan_push/pop")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -55,8 +55,7 @@ struct bpf_jit {
#define SEEN_LITERAL 8 /* code uses literals */
#define SEEN_FUNC 16 /* calls C functions */
#define SEEN_TAIL_CALL 32 /* code uses tail calls */
-#define SEEN_SKB_CHANGE 64 /* code changes skb data */
-#define SEEN_REG_AX 128 /* code uses constant blinding */
+#define SEEN_REG_AX 64 /* code uses constant blinding */
#define SEEN_STACK (SEEN_FUNC | SEEN_MEM | SEEN_SKB)
/*
@@ -448,12 +447,12 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, REG_W1, REG_0,
REG_15, 152);
}
- if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB)
+ if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB) {
emit_load_skb_data_hlen(jit);
- if (jit->seen & SEEN_SKB_CHANGE)
/* stg %b1,ST_OFF_SKBP(%r0,%r15) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, BPF_REG_1, REG_0, REG_15,
STK_OFF_SKBP);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -983,8 +982,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct
EMIT2(0x0d00, REG_14, REG_W1);
/* lgr %b0,%r2: load return value into %b0 */
EMIT4(0xb9040000, BPF_REG_0, REG_2);
- if (bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data((void *)func)) {
- jit->seen |= SEEN_SKB_CHANGE;
+ if ((jit->seen & SEEN_SKB) &&
+ bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data((void *)func)) {
/* lg %b1,ST_OFF_SKBP(%r15) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, BPF_REG_1, REG_0,
REG_15, STK_OFF_SKBP);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-integer-overflows.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-branch-pruning-logic.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-s390x-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-sparc-fix-usage-of-wrong-reg-for-load_skb_regs-after-call.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-incorrect-tracking-of-register-size-truncation.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-don-t-prune-branches-when-a-scalar-is-replaced-with-a-pointer.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-verifier-fix-bounds-calculation-on-bpf_rsh.patch
queue-4.14/selftests-bpf-add-tests-for-recent-bugfixes.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-corruption-on-concurrent-perf_event_output-calls.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-incorrect-sign-extension-in-check_alu_op.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-ppc64-do-not-reload-skb-pointers-in-non-skb-context.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-missing-error-return-in-check_stack_boundary.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-force-strict-alignment-checks-for-stack-pointers.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-32-bit-alu-op-verification.patch
queue-4.14/bpf-fix-build-issues-on-um-due-to-mising-bpf_perf_event.h.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 15:22 [PATCH stable/4.14 00/14] BPF stable patches for 4.14 Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:22 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 01/14] bpf: fix branch pruning logic Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 01/14] bpf: fix branch pruning logic" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 02/14] bpf: fix corruption on concurrent perf_event_output calls Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 02/14] bpf: fix corruption on concurrent perf_event_output calls" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 03/14] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` gregkh [this message]
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 04/14] bpf, ppc64: " Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 04/14] bpf, ppc64: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 05/14] bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 05/14] bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 06/14] bpf/verifier: fix bounds calculation on BPF_RSH Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 06/14] bpf/verifier: fix bounds calculation on BPF_RSH" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 07/14] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op() Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 07/14] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 08/14] bpf: fix incorrect tracking of register size truncation Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 08/14] bpf: fix incorrect tracking of register size truncation" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 09/14] bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 09/14] bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 10/14] bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary() Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 10/14] bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 11/14] bpf: force strict alignment checks for stack pointers Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 11/14] bpf: force strict alignment checks for stack pointers" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 12/14] bpf: don't prune branches when a scalar is replaced with a pointer Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 12/14] bpf: don't prune branches when a scalar is replaced with a pointer" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 13/14] bpf: fix integer overflows Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 13/14] bpf: fix integer overflows" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:23 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 14/14] selftests/bpf: add tests for recent bugfixes Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-22 15:47 ` Patch "[PATCH stable/4.14 14/14] selftests/bpf: add tests for recent bugfixes" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2017-12-22 15:45 ` [PATCH stable/4.14 00/14] BPF stable patches for 4.14 Greg KH
2017-12-22 15:48 ` Greg KH
2017-12-22 15:51 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151395766820657@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.