From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 11:14:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151471527810258@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-update-takeover-ips-after-configuration-change.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Sun Dec 31 11:12:48 CET 2017
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:56:32 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: update takeover IPs after configuration change
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 02f510f326501470348a5df341e8232c3497bbbb ]
Any modification to the takeover IP-ranges requires that we re-evaluate
which IP addresses are takeover-eligible. Otherwise we might do takeover
for some addresses when we no longer should, or vice-versa.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h | 4 +-
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 4 +-
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h | 2 -
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
@@ -565,8 +565,8 @@ enum qeth_cq {
struct qeth_ipato {
bool enabled;
- int invert4;
- int invert6;
+ bool invert4;
+ bool invert6;
struct list_head entries;
};
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -1480,8 +1480,8 @@ static int qeth_setup_card(struct qeth_c
/* IP address takeover */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&card->ipato.entries);
card->ipato.enabled = false;
- card->ipato.invert4 = 0;
- card->ipato.invert6 = 0;
+ card->ipato.invert4 = false;
+ card->ipato.invert6 = false;
/* init QDIO stuff */
qeth_init_qdio_info(card);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&card->buffer_reclaim_work, qeth_buffer_reclaim_work);
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ void qeth_l3_del_vipa(struct qeth_card *
int qeth_l3_add_rxip(struct qeth_card *, enum qeth_prot_versions, const u8 *);
void qeth_l3_del_rxip(struct qeth_card *card, enum qeth_prot_versions,
const u8 *);
-int qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
+void qeth_l3_update_ipato(struct qeth_card *card);
struct qeth_ipaddr *qeth_l3_get_addr_buffer(enum qeth_prot_versions);
int qeth_l3_add_ip(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
int qeth_l3_delete_ip(struct qeth_card *, struct qeth_ipaddr *);
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -163,8 +163,8 @@ static void qeth_l3_convert_addr_to_bits
}
}
-int qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *card,
- struct qeth_ipaddr *addr)
+static bool qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(struct qeth_card *card,
+ struct qeth_ipaddr *addr)
{
struct qeth_ipato_entry *ipatoe;
u8 addr_bits[128] = {0, };
@@ -605,6 +605,27 @@ int qeth_l3_setrouting_v6(struct qeth_ca
/*
* IP address takeover related functions
*/
+
+/**
+ * qeth_l3_update_ipato() - Update 'takeover' property, for all NORMAL IPs.
+ *
+ * Caller must hold ip_lock.
+ */
+void qeth_l3_update_ipato(struct qeth_card *card)
+{
+ struct qeth_ipaddr *addr;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, addr, hnode) {
+ if (addr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL)
+ continue;
+ if (qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(card, addr))
+ addr->set_flags |= QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ else
+ addr->set_flags &= ~QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ }
+}
+
static void qeth_l3_clear_ipato_list(struct qeth_card *card)
{
struct qeth_ipato_entry *ipatoe, *tmp;
@@ -616,6 +637,7 @@ static void qeth_l3_clear_ipato_list(str
kfree(ipatoe);
}
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
}
@@ -640,8 +662,10 @@ int qeth_l3_add_ipato_entry(struct qeth_
}
}
- if (!rc)
+ if (!rc) {
list_add_tail(&new->entry, &card->ipato.entries);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ }
spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
@@ -664,6 +688,7 @@ void qeth_l3_del_ipato_entry(struct qeth
(proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)? 4:16) &&
(ipatoe->mask_bits == mask_bits)) {
list_del(&ipatoe->entry);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
kfree(ipatoe);
}
}
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
@@ -370,9 +370,8 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_enable_
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct qeth_ipaddr *addr;
- int i, rc = 0;
bool enable;
+ int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -391,20 +390,12 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_enable_
goto out;
}
- if (card->ipato.enabled == enable)
- goto out;
- card->ipato.enabled = enable;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
- hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, addr, hnode) {
- if (addr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL)
- continue;
- if (!enable)
- addr->set_flags &= ~QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
- else if (qeth_l3_is_addr_covered_by_ipato(card, addr))
- addr->set_flags |= QETH_IPA_SETIP_TAKEOVER_FLAG;
+ if (card->ipato.enabled != enable) {
+ card->ipato.enabled = enable;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
@@ -430,20 +421,27 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_invert4
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ bool invert;
int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&card->conf_mutex);
- if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = (card->ipato.invert4)? 0 : 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "1"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "0"))
- card->ipato.invert4 = 0;
- else
+ if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle")) {
+ invert = !card->ipato.invert4;
+ } else if (kstrtobool(buf, &invert)) {
rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ipato.invert4 != invert) {
+ card->ipato.invert4 = invert;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ }
+out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
}
@@ -609,20 +607,27 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_invert6
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ bool invert;
int rc = 0;
if (!card)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&card->conf_mutex);
- if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = (card->ipato.invert6)? 0 : 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "1"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = 1;
- else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "0"))
- card->ipato.invert6 = 0;
- else
+ if (sysfs_streq(buf, "toggle")) {
+ invert = !card->ipato.invert6;
+ } else if (kstrtobool(buf, &invert)) {
rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ipato.invert6 != invert) {
+ card->ipato.invert6 = invert;
+ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ qeth_l3_update_ipato(card);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock);
+ }
+out:
mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
return rc ? rc : count;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-lock-ip-table-while-applying-takeover-changes.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-error-handling-in-checksum-cmd-callback.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-apply-takeover-changes-when-mode-is-toggled.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-update-takeover-ips-after-configuration-change.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-don-t-apply-takeover-changes-to-rxip.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-12-31 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151471527810258@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.