From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ncardwell@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, soheil@google.com, ycheng@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:08:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1514923694163243@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tcp_bbr-reset-long-term-bandwidth-sampling-on-loss-recovery-undo.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 600647d467c6d04b3954b41a6ee1795b5ae00550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:43:32 -0500
Subject: tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
commit 600647d467c6d04b3954b41a6ee1795b5ae00550 upstream.
Fix BBR so that upon notification of a loss recovery undo BBR resets
long-term bandwidth sampling.
Under high reordering, reordering events can be interpreted as loss.
If the reordering and spurious loss estimates are high enough, this
can cause BBR to spuriously estimate that we are seeing loss rates
high enough to trigger long-term bandwidth estimation. To avoid that
problem, this commit resets long-term bandwidth sampling on loss
recovery undo events.
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ static u32 bbr_undo_cwnd(struct sock *sk
bbr->full_bw = 0; /* spurious slow-down; reset full pipe detection */
bbr->full_bw_cnt = 0;
+ bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk);
return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ncardwell@google.com are
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-reset-full-pipe-detection-on-loss-recovery-undo.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-reset-long-term-bandwidth-sampling-on-loss-recovery-undo.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1514923694163243@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.