From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com,
alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, chf.fritz@googlemail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "rtc: m41t80: remove unneeded checks from m41t80_sqw_set_rate" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:12:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15150643321421@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
rtc: m41t80: remove unneeded checks from m41t80_sqw_set_rate
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
rtc-m41t80-remove-unneeded-checks-from-m41t80_sqw_set_rate.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 05a03bf260e0480bfc0db91b1fdbc2115e3f193b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 18:58:16 -0700
Subject: rtc: m41t80: remove unneeded checks from m41t80_sqw_set_rate
From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
commit 05a03bf260e0480bfc0db91b1fdbc2115e3f193b upstream.
m41t80_sqw_set_rate will be called with the result from
m41t80_sqw_round_rate, so might as well make
m41t80_sqw_set_rate(n) same as
m41t80_sqw_set_rate(m41t80_sqw_round_rate(n))
As Russell King wrote[1],
"clk_round_rate() is supposed to tell you what you end up with if you
ask clk_set_rate() to set the exact same value you passed in - but
clk_round_rate() won't modify the hardware."
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080175.html
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
@@ -490,17 +490,12 @@ static int m41t80_sqw_set_rate(struct cl
M41T80_REG_WDAY : M41T80_REG_SQW;
int reg, ret, val = 0;
- if (rate) {
- if (!is_power_of_2(rate))
- return -EINVAL;
- val = ilog2(rate);
- if (val == ilog2(M41T80_SQW_MAX_FREQ))
- val = 1;
- else if (val < (ilog2(M41T80_SQW_MAX_FREQ) - 1))
- val = ilog2(M41T80_SQW_MAX_FREQ) - val;
- else
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ if (rate >= M41T80_SQW_MAX_FREQ)
+ val = 1;
+ else if (rate >= M41T80_SQW_MAX_FREQ / 4)
+ val = 2;
+ else if (rate)
+ val = 15 - ilog2(rate);
reg = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg_sqw);
if (reg < 0)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com are
queue-4.14/rtc-m41t80-m41t80_sqw_set_rate-should-return-0-on-success.patch
queue-4.14/rtc-m41t80-avoid-i2c-read-in-m41t80_sqw_is_prepared.patch
queue-4.14/rtc-m41t80-avoid-i2c-read-in-m41t80_sqw_recalc_rate.patch
queue-4.14/rtc-m41t80-remove-unneeded-checks-from-m41t80_sqw_set_rate.patch
queue-4.14/rtc-m41t80-fix-m41t80_sqw_round_rate-return-value.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15150643321421@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=chf.fritz@googlemail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.