All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, chao.wang@ucloud.cn,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:45:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151522835019252@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu()

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     x86-cpu-avoid-unnecessary-ipis-in-arch_freq_get_on_cpu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From b29c6ef7bb1257853c1e31616d84f55e561cf631 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:15:39 +0100
Subject: x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

commit b29c6ef7bb1257853c1e31616d84f55e561cf631 upstream.

Even though aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() caches the samples.khz value to
return if called again in a sufficiently short time, its caller,
arch_freq_get_on_cpu(), still uses smp_call_function_single() to run it
which may allow user space to trigger an IPI storm by reading from the
scaling_cur_freq cpufreq sysfs file in a tight loop.

To avoid that, move the decision on whether or not to return the cached
samples.khz value to arch_freq_get_on_cpu().

This change was part of commit 941f5f0f6ef5 ("x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz"
in /proc/cpuinfo"), but it was not the reason for the revert and it
remains applicable.

Fixes: 4815d3c56d1e (cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: WANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
 	s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
-	if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
-		return;
-
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
@@ -74,6 +70,7 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
 
 unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
 {
+	s64 time_delta;
 	unsigned int khz;
 
 	if (!cpu_khz)
@@ -82,6 +79,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cp
 	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
 		return 0;
 
+	/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
+	time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
+	khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
+	if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
+		return khz;
+
 	smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
 	khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
 	if (khz)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com are

queue-4.14/x86-cpu-always-show-current-cpu-frequency-in-proc-cpuinfo.patch
queue-4.14/x86-cpu-avoid-unnecessary-ipis-in-arch_freq_get_on_cpu.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-01-06  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151522835019252@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=chao.wang@ucloud.cn \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.