From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikola =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Forr=F3?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:10:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1515503441.3260.37.camel@redhat.com> References: <1509023167.2859.2.camel@redhat.com> <69ba335d-c0d4-d032-6d92-1467214653cb@gmail.com> Reply-To: nforro-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <69ba335d-c0d4-d032-6d92-1467214653cb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 00:39 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > I am not sure that I understand that last sentence. Do you mean something > like: > > The caller can retry the transmission, starting at first failed message, > but there is no guarantee that, if an error is returned, it will be the > same error as the one that was lost on the previous call. > > ? > Hello Michael, yes, that's exactly what I meant. I'll update and re-send the patch. Thanks, Nikola -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html