From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tiwai@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Remove incorrect snd_BUG_ON() usages" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:18:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15156551293464@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ALSA: pcm: Remove incorrect snd_BUG_ON() usages
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
alsa-pcm-remove-incorrect-snd_bug_on-usages.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From fe08f34d066f4404934a509b6806db1a4f700c86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 09:50:50 +0100
Subject: ALSA: pcm: Remove incorrect snd_BUG_ON() usages
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit fe08f34d066f4404934a509b6806db1a4f700c86 upstream.
syzkaller triggered kernel warnings through PCM OSS emulation at
closing a stream:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3502 at sound/core/pcm_lib.c:1635
snd_pcm_hw_param_first+0x289/0x690 sound/core/pcm_lib.c:1635
Call Trace:
....
snd_pcm_hw_param_near.constprop.27+0x78d/0x9a0 sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:457
snd_pcm_oss_change_params+0x17d3/0x3720 sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:969
snd_pcm_oss_make_ready+0xaa/0x130 sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:1128
snd_pcm_oss_sync+0x257/0x830 sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:1638
snd_pcm_oss_release+0x20b/0x280 sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:2431
__fput+0x327/0x7e0 fs/file_table.c:210
....
This happens while it tries to open and set up the aloop device
concurrently. The warning above (invoked from snd_BUG_ON() macro) is
to detect the unexpected logical error where snd_pcm_hw_refine() call
shouldn't fail. The theory is true for the case where the hw_params
config rules are static. But for an aloop device, the hw_params rule
condition does vary dynamically depending on the connected target;
when another device is opened and changes the parameters, the device
connected in another side is also affected, and it caused the error
from snd_pcm_hw_refine().
That is, the simplest "solution" for this is to remove the incorrect
assumption of static rules, and treat such an error as a normal error
path. As there are a couple of other places using snd_BUG_ON()
incorrectly, this patch removes these spurious snd_BUG_ON() calls.
Reported-by: syzbot+6f11c7e2a1b91d466432@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c | 1 -
sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c
+++ b/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c
@@ -466,7 +466,6 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_param_near(struct
v = snd_pcm_hw_param_last(pcm, params, var, dir);
else
v = snd_pcm_hw_param_first(pcm, params, var, dir);
- snd_BUG_ON(v < 0);
return v;
}
--- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ int snd_pcm_hw_param_first(struct snd_pc
return changed;
if (params->rmask) {
int err = snd_pcm_hw_refine(pcm, params);
- if (snd_BUG_ON(err < 0))
+ if (err < 0)
return err;
}
return snd_pcm_hw_param_value(params, var, dir);
@@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ int snd_pcm_hw_param_last(struct snd_pcm
return changed;
if (params->rmask) {
int err = snd_pcm_hw_refine(pcm, params);
- if (snd_BUG_ON(err < 0))
+ if (err < 0)
return err;
}
return snd_pcm_hw_param_value(params, var, dir);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tiwai@suse.de are
queue-4.9/alsa-pcm-remove-incorrect-snd_bug_on-usages.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-aloop-fix-inconsistent-format-due-to-incomplete-rule.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-pcm-add-missing-error-checks-in-oss-emulation-plugin-builder.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-pcm-abort-properly-at-pending-signal-in-oss-read-write-loops.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-pcm-allow-aborting-mutex-lock-at-oss-read-write-loops.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-aloop-fix-racy-hw-constraints-adjustment.patch
queue-4.9/alsa-aloop-release-cable-upon-open-error-path.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15156551293464@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.