Patch "bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-add-bpf_patch_insn_single-helper.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From c237ee5eb33bf19fe0591c04ff8db19da7323a83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:08:30 +0200
Subject: bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit c237ee5eb33bf19fe0591c04ff8db19da7323a83 upstream.

Move the functionality to patch instructions out of the verifier
code and into the core as the new bpf_patch_insn_single() helper
will be needed later on for blinding as well. No changes in
functionality.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 4ff0e647598f..c4aae496f376 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ u64 __bpf_call_base(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
 void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp);
 bool bpf_helper_changes_skb_data(void *func);
 
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
+				       const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 extern int bpf_jit_enable;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 5313d09d4b62..49b5538a5301 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -136,6 +136,77 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 	vfree(fp);
 }
 
+static bool bpf_is_jmp_and_has_target(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	return BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP  &&
+	       /* Call and Exit are both special jumps with no
+		* target inside the BPF instruction image.
+		*/
+	       BPF_OP(insn->code) != BPF_CALL &&
+	       BPF_OP(insn->code) != BPF_EXIT;
+}
+
+static void bpf_adj_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 pos, u32 delta)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
+	u32 i, insn_cnt = prog->len;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		if (!bpf_is_jmp_and_has_target(insn))
+			continue;
+
+		/* Adjust offset of jmps if we cross boundaries. */
+		if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos)
+			insn->off += delta;
+		else if (i > pos + delta && i + insn->off + 1 <= pos + delta)
+			insn->off -= delta;
+	}
+}
+
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
+				       const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len)
+{
+	u32 insn_adj_cnt, insn_rest, insn_delta = len - 1;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog_adj;
+
+	/* Since our patchlet doesn't expand the image, we're done. */
+	if (insn_delta == 0) {
+		memcpy(prog->insnsi + off, patch, sizeof(*patch));
+		return prog;
+	}
+
+	insn_adj_cnt = prog->len + insn_delta;
+
+	/* Several new instructions need to be inserted. Make room
+	 * for them. Likely, there's no need for a new allocation as
+	 * last page could have large enough tailroom.
+	 */
+	prog_adj = bpf_prog_realloc(prog, bpf_prog_size(insn_adj_cnt),
+				    GFP_USER);
+	if (!prog_adj)
+		return NULL;
+
+	prog_adj->len = insn_adj_cnt;
+
+	/* Patching happens in 3 steps:
+	 *
+	 * 1) Move over tail of insnsi from next instruction onwards,
+	 *    so we can patch the single target insn with one or more
+	 *    new ones (patching is always from 1 to n insns, n > 0).
+	 * 2) Inject new instructions at the target location.
+	 * 3) Adjust branch offsets if necessary.
+	 */
+	insn_rest = insn_adj_cnt - off - len;
+
+	memmove(prog_adj->insnsi + off + len, prog_adj->insnsi + off + 1,
+		sizeof(*patch) * insn_rest);
+	memcpy(prog_adj->insnsi + off, patch, sizeof(*patch) * len);
+
+	bpf_adj_branches(prog_adj, off, insn_delta);
+
+	return prog_adj;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 struct bpf_binary_header *
 bpf_jit_binary_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 84bff68cf80e..a08d66215245 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2587,26 +2587,6 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct verifier_env *env)
 			insn->src_reg = 0;
 }
 
-static void adjust_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, int pos, int delta)
-{
-	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
-	int insn_cnt = prog->len;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
-		if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_JMP ||
-		    BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_CALL ||
-		    BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_EXIT)
-			continue;
-
-		/* adjust offset of jmps if necessary */
-		if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos)
-			insn->off += delta;
-		else if (i > pos + delta && i + insn->off + 1 <= pos + delta)
-			insn->off -= delta;
-	}
-}
-
 /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
  * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
  */
@@ -2616,14 +2596,15 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 	int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
 	struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16];
 	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
-	u32 cnt;
-	int i;
 	enum bpf_access_type type;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!env->prog->aux->ops->convert_ctx_access)
 		return 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		u32 insn_delta, cnt;
+
 		if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
 			type = BPF_READ;
 		else if (insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
@@ -2645,34 +2626,18 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		if (cnt == 1) {
-			memcpy(insn, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn));
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/* several new insns need to be inserted. Make room for them */
-		insn_cnt += cnt - 1;
-		new_prog = bpf_prog_realloc(env->prog,
-					    bpf_prog_size(insn_cnt),
-					    GFP_USER);
+		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i, insn_buf, cnt);
 		if (!new_prog)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		new_prog->len = insn_cnt;
-
-		memmove(new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt, new_prog->insns + i + 1,
-			sizeof(*insn) * (insn_cnt - i - cnt));
-
-		/* copy substitute insns in place of load instruction */
-		memcpy(new_prog->insnsi + i, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn) * cnt);
-
-		/* adjust branches in the whole program */
-		adjust_branches(new_prog, i, cnt - 1);
+		insn_delta = cnt - 1;
 
 		/* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */
 		env->prog = new_prog;
-		insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt - 1;
-		i += cnt - 1;
+		insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + insn_delta;
+
+		insn_cnt += insn_delta;
+		i        += insn_delta;
 	}
 
 	return 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are

queue-4.4/bpf-add-bpf_patch_insn_single-helper.patch