From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hdegoede@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, peda@axentia.se
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mux: core: fix double get_device()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:24:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15159182497661@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mux: core: fix double get_device()
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mux-core-fix-double-get_device.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From aa1f10e85b0ab53dee85d8e293c8159d18d293a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:22:54 +0100
Subject: mux: core: fix double get_device()
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
commit aa1f10e85b0ab53dee85d8e293c8159d18d293a8 upstream.
class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mux/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct devi
return dev->of_node == data;
}
+/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
{
struct device *dev;
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
(!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
np, args.np);
+ put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
np, controller, args.np);
+ put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hdegoede@redhat.com are
queue-4.14/uas-ignore-uas-for-norelsys-ns1068-x-chips.patch
queue-4.14/mux-core-fix-double-get_device.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15159182497661@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.