From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Do not instiate a platform_dev for devs without a mmio resource
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:33:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516016025.7000.992.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115093615.GA27654@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:36 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > acpi_lpss_create_device() skips handling LPSS devices which do not
> > have
> > a mmio resources in their resource list (typically these devices are
> > disabled by the firmware). But since the LPSS code does not bind to
> > the
> > device, acpi_bus_attach() ends up still creating a platform device
> > for
> > it and the regular platform_driver for the ACPI HID still tries to
> > bind
> > to it.
> >
> > This happens e.g. on some boards which do not use the pwm-controller
> > and have an empty or invalid resource-table for it. Currently this
> > causes
> > these error messages to get logged:
> > [ 3.281966] pwm-lpss 80862288:00: invalid resource
> > [ 3.287098] pwm-lpss: probe of 80862288:00 failed with error -22
> >
> > This commit stops the undesirable creation of a platform_device for
> > disabled LPSS devices by setting pnp.type.platform_id to 0. Note
> > that
> > acpi_scan_attach_handler() also sets pnp.type.platform_id to 0 when
> > there
> > is a matching handler for the device and that handler has no attach
> > callback, so we simply behave as a handler without an attach
> > function
> > in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Seems like a good way to fix it IMHO,
Yeah, looks much better for my opinion than previous hack to PWM
platform driver.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 20:01 [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Do not instiate a platform_dev for devs without a mmio resource Hans de Goede
2018-01-14 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-15 8:42 ` Hans de Goede
2018-01-15 9:36 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-01-15 11:33 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516016025.7000.992.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.