From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/6] sock: MSG_PEEK support for sk_error_queue
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:54:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516290887.3606.21.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118110207.GA24920@oracle.com>
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 06:02 -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (01/17/18 18:50), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >
> > This can cause reordering with parallel readers. Can we avoid the need
> > for peeking? It also caused a slew of subtle bugs previously.
>
> Yes, I did notice the potential for re-ordering when writing the patch..
> but these are not actuallly messages from the wire, so is re-ordering
> fatal?
Some applications out there would break horribly, trust me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 12:19 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/6] rds: zerocopy support Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/6] sock: MSG_PEEK support for sk_error_queue Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 23:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 11:02 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-18 16:10 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 16:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-18 17:12 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 22:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 23:03 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 23:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 23:20 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 23:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 15:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/6] skbuff: export mm_[un]account_pinned_pages for other modules Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] rds: hold a sock ref from rds_message to the rds_sock Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/6] sock: permit SO_ZEROCOPY on PF_RDS socket Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/6] rds: support for zcopy completion notification Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 11:40 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 22:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 6/6] rds: zerocopy Tx support Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516290887.3606.21.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.