From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: labbott@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86: Use __nostackprotect for sme_encrypt_kernel" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:36:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151653098223234@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86: Use __nostackprotect for sme_encrypt_kernel
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-use-__nostackprotect-for-sme_encrypt_kernel.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 91cfc88c66bf8ab95937606569670cf67fa73e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:14:02 -0800
Subject: x86: Use __nostackprotect for sme_encrypt_kernel
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
commit 91cfc88c66bf8ab95937606569670cf67fa73e09 upstream.
Commit bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME
PGD mapping") moved some parameters into a structure.
The structure was large enough to trigger the stack protection canary in
sme_encrypt_kernel which doesn't work this early, causing reboots.
Mark sme_encrypt_kernel appropriately to not use the canary.
Fixes: bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping")
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static unsigned long __init sme_pgtable_
return total;
}
-void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp)
+void __init __nostackprotector sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp)
{
unsigned long workarea_start, workarea_end, workarea_len;
unsigned long execute_start, execute_end, execute_len;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from labbott@redhat.com are
queue-4.14/x86-use-__nostackprotect-for-sme_encrypt_kernel.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-21 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151653098223234@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.