diff for duplicates of <1516625803.3772.124.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1a5ffbb..ebb5f65 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:16 +0100, Alban Crequy wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. If that other flag is about whether it is > a pseudo filesystem, it might not have "IMA" in the name though. -Agreed. If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most -likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). So the +Agreed. ?If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most +likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). ?So the current name is fine. > >> > I'm also wondering if this change should be @@ -78,3 +78,8 @@ current name is fine. thanks, Mimi + +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in +the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 5cd0752..3501ea9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,24 +3,10 @@ "ref\0CADZs7q4StoPLD4-CSXp5DkgPh29vrZWjayTAYkMAsrDychLOoQ@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\01516380970.3772.112.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\0CADZs7q68zORejnVBfQ38K6PtUTj_5OqkYjMvTa=Fi+UEyPp+FQ@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ima,fuse: introduce new fs flag FS_NO_IMA_CACHE\0" + "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH v2] ima,fuse: introduce new fs flag FS_NO_IMA_CACHE\0" "Date\0Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:56:43 -0500\0" - "To\0Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>\0" - "Cc\0Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@gmail.com>" - " Iago L\303\263pez Galeiras <iago@kinvolk.io>" - Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io> - LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> - Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com> - James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> - Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> - Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> - " Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:16 +0100, Alban Crequy wrote:\n" @@ -86,8 +72,8 @@ "> Thanks for the explanation. If that other flag is about whether it is\n" "> a pseudo filesystem, it might not have \"IMA\" in the name though.\n" "\n" - "Agreed. If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most\n" - "likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). So the\n" + "Agreed. ?If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most\n" + "likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). ?So the\n" "current name is fine.\n" "\n" "> >> > I'm also wondering if this change should be\n" @@ -102,6 +88,11 @@ "\n" "thanks,\n" "\n" - Mimi + "Mimi\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -322463e31a92254d7d56da40408ed1fbedbfe64687eee3fd7a785f856e8fc477 +a94d9bfdc4fcc31b9746f9505a1c429c0bd240be8c533cb019cd452754f7de90
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1a5ffbb..6bf2406 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:16 +0100, Alban Crequy wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. If that other flag is about whether it is > a pseudo filesystem, it might not have "IMA" in the name though. -Agreed. If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most -likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). So the +Agreed. If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most +likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). So the current name is fine. > >> > I'm also wondering if this change should be diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 5cd0752..f40559d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ "> Thanks for the explanation. If that other flag is about whether it is\n" "> a pseudo filesystem, it might not have \"IMA\" in the name though.\n" "\n" - "Agreed. If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most\n" - "likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). So the\n" + "Agreed. \302\240If we ever need to define another FS flag, we would most\n" + "likely define it in the negative (eg. FS_NO_IMA_XXXXX). \302\240So the\n" "current name is fine.\n" "\n" "> >> > I'm also wondering if this change should be\n" @@ -104,4 +104,4 @@ "\n" Mimi -322463e31a92254d7d56da40408ed1fbedbfe64687eee3fd7a785f856e8fc477 +b5dde8e6b43e6d73fb7bd17e75b41b4f1cd4aca08409c087e022679ca61b13b6
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.