All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Fix BDW late-loading revision check" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:25:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15167859213060@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124023119.kaendz4jiuejowxr@xylophone.i.decadent.org.uk>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    x86/microcode/intel: Fix BDW late-loading revision check

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     x86-microcode-intel-fix-bdw-late-loading-revision-check.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk  Wed Jan 24 10:19:07 2018
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 02:31:19 +0000
Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Fix BDW late-loading revision check
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20180124023119.kaendz4jiuejowxr@xylophone.i.decadent.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline

From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>

The backport of commit b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
late-loading with a revision check") to 4.4-stable deleted a "return true"
statement.  This bug is not present upstream or other stable branches.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int
 	    c->microcode < 0x0b000021) {
 		pr_err_once("Erratum BDF90: late loading with revision < 0x0b000021 (0x%x) disabled.\n", c->microcode);
 		pr_err_once("Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n");
+		return true;
 	}
 
 	return false;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk are

queue-4.4/x86-microcode-intel-fix-bdw-late-loading-revision-check.patch

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-24  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-24  2:31 [PATCH 4.4] x86/microcode/intel: Fix BDW late-loading revision check Ben Hutchings
2018-01-24  9:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-24  9:25 ` gregkh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15167859213060@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.