From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com, fw@strlen.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mkubecek@suse.cz,
pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: reject verdict request from different portid" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:49:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151680177729169@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: reject verdict request from different portid
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nfnetlink_queue-reject-verdict-request-from-different-portid.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 00a3101f561816e58de054a470484996f78eb5eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:07:27 +0800
Subject: netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: reject verdict request from different portid
From: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
commit 00a3101f561816e58de054a470484996f78eb5eb upstream.
Like NFQNL_MSG_VERDICT_BATCH do, we should also reject the verdict
request when the portid is not same with the initial portid(maybe
from another process).
Fixes: 97d32cf9440d ("netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: batch verdict support")
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Acked-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
@@ -1053,10 +1053,8 @@ nfqnl_recv_verdict(struct sock *ctnl, st
struct net *net = sock_net(ctnl);
struct nfnl_queue_net *q = nfnl_queue_pernet(net);
- queue = instance_lookup(q, queue_num);
- if (!queue)
- queue = verdict_instance_lookup(q, queue_num,
- NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
+ queue = verdict_instance_lookup(q, queue_num,
+ NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
if (IS_ERR(queue))
return PTR_ERR(queue);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com are
queue-4.4/netfilter-nf_ct_expect-remove-the-redundant-slash-when-policy-name-is-empty.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-nfnetlink_queue-reject-verdict-request-from-different-portid.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151680177729169@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.