From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kkamagui@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jlee@suse.com,
lv.zheng@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
robert.moore@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ACPICA: Namespace: fix operand cache leak" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516801806148192@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ACPICA: Namespace: fix operand cache leak
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
acpica-namespace-fix-operand-cache-leak.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3b2d69114fefa474fca542e51119036dceb4aa6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:18:08 +0800
Subject: ACPICA: Namespace: fix operand cache leak
From: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
commit 3b2d69114fefa474fca542e51119036dceb4aa6f upstream.
ACPICA commit a23325b2e583556eae88ed3f764e457786bf4df6
I found some ACPI operand cache leaks in ACPI early abort cases.
Boot log of ACPI operand cache leak is as follows:
>[ 0.174332] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
>[ 0.175504] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
>[ 0.176010] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
>[ 0.177032] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
>[ 0.178284] ACPI: SCI (IRQ16705) allocation failed
>[ 0.179352] ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_ACQUIRED, Unable to install
System Control Interrupt handler (20160930/evevent-131)
>[ 0.180008] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter
>[ 0.181125] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler
(20160930/evmisc-281)
>[ 0.184068] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Operand: Slab cache still has
objects
>[ 0.185358] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc3 #2
>[ 0.186820] Hardware name: innotek gmb_h virtual_box/virtual_box, BIOS
virtual_box 12/01/2006
>[ 0.188000] Call Trace:
>[ 0.188000] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x7d
>[ 0.188000] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x224/0x230
>[ 0.188000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x22/0x22
>[ 0.188000] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0xd
>[ 0.188000] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x3f/0x7b
>[ 0.188000] ? acpi_terminate+0x5/0xf
>[ 0.188000] ? acpi_init+0x288/0x32e
>[ 0.188000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
>[ 0.188000] ? video_setup+0x7a/0x7a
>[ 0.188000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1b0
>[ 0.188000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x194/0x21a
>[ 0.188000] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
>[ 0.188000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
>[ 0.188000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
When early abort is occurred due to invalid ACPI information, Linux kernel
terminates ACPI by calling acpi_terminate() function. The function calls
acpi_ns_terminate() function to delete namespace data and ACPI operand cache
(acpi_gbl_module_code_list).
But the deletion code in acpi_ns_terminate() function is wrapped in
ACPI_EXEC_APP definition, therefore the code is only executed when the
definition exists. If the define doesn't exist, ACPI operand cache
(acpi_gbl_module_code_list) is leaked, and stack dump is shown in kernel log.
This causes a security threat because the old kernel (<= 4.9) shows memory
locations of kernel functions in stack dump, therefore kernel ASLR can be
neutralized.
To fix ACPI operand leak for enhancing security, I made a patch which
removes the ACPI_EXEC_APP define in acpi_ns_terminate() function for
executing the deletion code unconditionally.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/a23325b2
Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/nsutils.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsutils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsutils.c
@@ -594,25 +594,20 @@ struct acpi_namespace_node *acpi_ns_vali
void acpi_ns_terminate(void)
{
acpi_status status;
+ union acpi_operand_object *prev;
+ union acpi_operand_object *next;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ns_terminate);
-#ifdef ACPI_EXEC_APP
- {
- union acpi_operand_object *prev;
- union acpi_operand_object *next;
+ /* Delete any module-level code blocks */
- /* Delete any module-level code blocks */
-
- next = acpi_gbl_module_code_list;
- while (next) {
- prev = next;
- next = next->method.mutex;
- prev->method.mutex = NULL; /* Clear the Mutex (cheated) field */
- acpi_ut_remove_reference(prev);
- }
+ next = acpi_gbl_module_code_list;
+ while (next) {
+ prev = next;
+ next = next->method.mutex;
+ prev->method.mutex = NULL; /* Clear the Mutex (cheated) field */
+ acpi_ut_remove_reference(prev);
}
-#endif
/*
* Free the entire namespace -- all nodes and all objects
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from kkamagui@gmail.com are
queue-4.9/acpica-namespace-fix-operand-cache-leak.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516801806148192@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=kkamagui@gmail.com \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.