Re: Bug, git rebase -i does not abort correctly

[Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2574 bytes --]

Hi,

On Thursday 25 January 2018 05:43 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> rebase scripts are too much for me, so I'll play the user reporting
> bugs this time :)
> 
> Instead of doing
> 
>     $ git rebase -i --onto origin/master @~3
> 
> I sometimes accidentally type
> 
>     $ git rebase -i origin/master @~3
> 
> ("rebase -i" is actually an alias, which is why I never forget to
type -i)
> 
> Usually the todo list in $EDITOR shows noop, I realize my mistake and
> try to abort it by clearing the todo list before saving and closing
> $EDITOR. The problem is, HEAD is moved away anyway (to origin/master
I
> think) 

For me it left HEAD at @~3. Reading the synopsis of `man git rebase` I
could guess that the corresponding abstract form would be,

    $ git rebase -i <upstream> <branch>


> even if rebase is supposed to abort the operation and leave
> HEAD untouched.
> 

This might seem to be a bug as the comment in "git-rebase-todo" says,

    However, if you remove everything, the rebase will be aborted.

But "man git rebase" clearly says,

    If <branch> is specified, git rebase will perform an automatic "git
    checkout <branch>" before doing anything else. Otherwise it remains
    on
    the current branch.

Junio has previously confirmed that "git rebase [-i] <upstream>
<branch>" is just a short hand for "git checkout <branch> && git rebase
[-i] <upstream>".[ref 1] So, it's not surprising that it left HEAD at
@~3 when you completely removed the contents of git-rebase-todo and
exited the editor.

Does that help solve your issue?


[ref 1]: 

https://public-inbox.org/git/%3Cxmqqpo8387hz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com%3E

-- 
Kaartic

QUOTE

“It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live
so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which
case, you fail by default.”

      - J. K. Rowling


WIKIPEDIA: DID YOU KNOW?

Only 33% of internet users in India have heard of Wikipedia !!

* What do you think could be the reason behind this?

* What are ways in which the awareness about Wikipedia in India and
other countries be increased ?

Reference:

* Give your ideas for increasing the awareness of Wikipedia in India
and
in other countries and get a Grant from the Wikimedia Foundation to
bring your idea to life.

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire

* Know more about the awareness problem of Wikipedia

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_Readers/Awareness

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_Readers/Next_steps/Raising_awareness
-- 
Kaartic

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 2312 bytes --]

Hi,

I seem to able to reproduce your issue. More comments inline.

On Thursday 25 January 2018 05:43 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> rebase scripts are too much for me, so I'll play the user reporting
> bugs this time :)
> 
> Instead of doing
> 
>     $ git rebase -i --onto origin/master @~3
> 
> I sometimes accidentally type
> 
>     $ git rebase -i origin/master @~3
> 
> ("rebase -i" is actually an alias, which is why I never forget to type -i)
> 
> Usually the todo list in $EDITOR shows noop, I realize my mistake and
> try to abort it by clearing the todo list before saving and closing
> $EDITOR. The problem is, HEAD is moved away anyway (to origin/master I
> think) 

For me it left HEAD at @~3. Reading the synopsis of `man git rebase` I
could guess that the corresponding abstract form would be,

    $ git rebase -i <upstream> <branch>


> even if rebase is supposed to abort the operation and leave
> HEAD untouched.
> 

This might seem to be a bug as the comment in "git-rebase-todo" says,

    However, if you remove everything, the rebase will be aborted.

But "man git rebase" clearly says,

    If <branch> is specified, git rebase will perform an automatic git
checkout <branch> before doing anything else. Otherwise it remains on
       the current branch.
Surprisingly when git-rebase-todo's content is only a "noop" just
closing the editor without removing the contents also seems to be lying
as it checks
-- 
Kaartic

QUOTE

“It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live
so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which
case, you fail by default.”

      - J. K. Rowling


WIKIPEDIA: DID YOU KNOW?

Only 33% of internet users in India have heard of Wikipedia !!

* What do you think could be the reason behind this?

* What are ways in which the awareness about Wikipedia in India and
other countries be increased ?

Reference:

* Give your ideas for increasing the awareness of Wikipedia in India and
in other countries and get a Grant from the Wikimedia Foundation to
bring your idea to life.

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire

* Know more about the awareness problem of Wikipedia

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_Readers/Awareness

  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_Readers/Next_steps/Raising_awareness