From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
long7573@126.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:50:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517417415137170@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
loop-fix-concurrent-lo_open-lo_release.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ae6650163c66a7eff1acd6eb8b0f752dcfa8eba5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:26:00 -0800
Subject: loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit ae6650163c66a7eff1acd6eb8b0f752dcfa8eba5 upstream.
范龙飞 reports that KASAN can report a use-after-free in __lock_acquire.
The reason is due to insufficient serialization in lo_release(), which
will continue to use the loop device even after it has decremented the
lo_refcnt to zero.
In the meantime, another process can come in, open the loop device
again as it is being shut down. Confusion ensues.
Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1558,9 +1558,8 @@ out:
return err;
}
-static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
{
- struct loop_device *lo = disk->private_data;
int err;
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
@@ -1586,6 +1585,13 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
}
+static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+ __lo_release(disk->private_data);
+ mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+}
+
static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = lo_open,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from torvalds@linux-foundation.org are
queue-4.9/loop-fix-concurrent-lo_open-lo_release.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517417415137170@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=long7573@126.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.